Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 24.
Published in final edited form as: J Behav Med. 2009 Oct 30;33(1):24–34. doi: 10.1007/s10865-009-9231-6

Table 1.

Hierarchical Multiple Regressions of Interactions Associated with Perceived Benefits and Intention

Step and Predictor Statistics by Step Statistics by Predictor
TR2 R2 Change β t
Outcome: General Benefits (N = 169)
1. Education .09 .09** .11 1.16
 Household income .19 2.26*
 Occupation .02 .17
2. Regular physician .12 .03 .04 .60
 Physician recommendation .15 1.93
3. Group susceptibility .15 .03* .09 1.20
4. Traditional acculturative strategy .19 .04** .23 3.14**
5. Group Susceptibility × Traditional .22 .03* .19 2.56*

Outcome: General Benefits (N = 165)
1. Education .11 .11** .11 1.26
 Household income .20 2.53*
 Occupation −.01 −.14
2. Regular physician .13 .02 .03 .47
 Physician recommendation .06 .88
3. Group susceptibility .18 .05** .29 4.28**
4. Medical mistrust .23 .05** −.28 −3.92**
5. Group Susceptibility × Medical Mistrust .27 .04** .20 3.04**

Outcome: General Intention (N = 176)
1. Age .02 .02 .11 1.43
2. Education .08 .07** .16 1.60
 Household income .17 1.82
 Occupation −.03 −.33
3. Insurance .10 .01 .03 .33
 Regular physician −.03 −.39
 Physician recommendation .09 1.20
4. Physician ethnicity .11 .01 .10 1.31
5. Medial mistrust .11 .00 −.02 −.23
6. Physician ethnicity × Medical Mistrust .13 .03* .17 2.32*

Outcome: General Intention (N = 165)
1. Age .06 .06** .12 1.53
2. Education .11 .05* .12 1.34
 Household income .11 1.32
 Occupation −.02 −.23
3. Insurance .14 .03 .12 1.60
 Regular physician .07 .95
 Physician recommendation .13 1.74
4. Group susceptibility .14 .00 −.06 −.78
5. Traditional acculturative strategy .21 .07** .34 4.72**
6. Group Susceptibility × Traditional .30 .09** ..33 4.49**

Note:

*

p < .05

**

p < .01; reduced N’s due to missing data.