Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychosom Med. 2011 Jan 7;73(2):173–184. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31820824f6

Table 3.

Summary of studies which include patients with motor conversion symptoms

Study Comparison Control Group N Imaging
Modality
Areas of increased
activation in clinical
group
Areas of decreased
activation in clinical
group
Notes
(126) Attempted movement
vs. rest
None 1 PET Increased activity in
ACC (BA 24/32) and
OFC (BA 10)
No statistical analyses
performed. Authors note
an absence of motor
cortex activity
(127) Resting None 5 SPECT Left Temporal and
Parietal regions
No statistical analyses
performed
(128) Attempted movement
vs. rest
Healthy controls
who feigned
weakness
2 PET Left dlPFC (BA
46)
Qualitative between
group comparison
(129) Movement vs. rest and
observation of moving
hand vs. observation of
resting hand
Healthy controls
who moved limbs
normally
4 fMRI Motor cortex
during movement
observation (BA
4)
No differences observed
during movement itself.
Qualitative comparison
between groups
(130) Attempted movement
vs. rest
Healthy controls
who feigned
weakness
4 fMRI Frontal (BA 47),
striatal and lingual
cortex (BA 18)
Motor (BA 4) and
OFC (BA 10/46)
Qualitative comparison
between groups
(131,
132)
Mental rotation of
affected vs. unaffected
hand
Within subject
analysis—
unaffected side
acts as control
8 fMRI Medial frontal (BA
9/11) and superior
temporal cortex (BA
22)
Non-parametric statistical
analysis performed
within subjects
(133) Go NoGo Task Healthy controls
who feigned
weakness
1 fMRI Ventromedial frontal
(BA32/10) and left
orbital frontal (BA 47)
Qualitative comparison
between groups. Effects
reported during
movement preparation