Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychosom Med. 2011 Jan 7;73(2):173–184. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31820824f6

Table 4.

Summary of studies of patients with sensory conversion symptoms

Study Comparison N Imaging
Modality
Areas of increased
activation in clinical group
Areas of decreased
activation in clinical
group
Notes
(134) Median nerve
stimulation vs. rest
1 SPECT Contralateral
Parietal Lobe
Perfusion abnormality resolved with
recovery
(135) Vibratory tactile
stimulation vs. rest
7 SPECT Contralateral basal
ganglia and
thalamus
In a subset of 4 patients who recovered the
hypoperfusion was found to have resolved
and baseline perfusion of the caudate nucleus
was found to predict recovery
(136) Painful and non-painful
tactile stimulation of
anaesthetic vs. normal
limb
4 fMRI Anterior ACC PFC, posterior
ACC and sensory
cortex
Across the group conditions were compared
with a qualitative analysis
(137)a Monocular visual
stimulation vs. rest.
5 fMRI Left inferior frontal
cortex (BA 47), insula
and uncus (BA 34) and
bilateral striatum
Visual cortex (BA
17/18) and ACC
(BA 25)
A non-clinical control group was also tested
allowing a between group analysis.
(138) Vibratory stimulation of
anaesthetic limb vs.
bilateral limb
stimulation
3 fMRI Contralateral
sensory cortex
Contralateral (to the symptoms) sensory
cortex was activated during bilateral
stimulation.
a

All patient groups reported loss of somatic sensation except in which the presenting complaint was unexplained visual loss.