Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Learn Individ Differ. 2011 Feb 1;21(1):85–95. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.10.005

Table 5.

Incremental R2 of the Hierarchical Latent Variable Regression Models Predicting Reading and Spelling Skills at Grade 1 across U.S./Australia ad Scandinavia.

Steps U.S./Australia
Scandinavia
WR_G1 PD_G1 S_G1 WR_G1 PD_G1 S_G1
1 Autoregressor_KG .516*** .496*** .364*** .477*** .419*** .391***
2 Vocabularyb .000 .000 .000 .020a* .001 .062***
3 RAN_KG .071*** .038*** .025*** .066*** .053** .026*
4 PA_KG .011** .013** .097*** .004a .008a .097***
3 PA_KG .021*** .023** .102*** .000 .000 .107***
4 RAN_KG .061*** .029*** .019*** .071*** .061*** .017
Total R2 .60 .55 .49 .57 .48 .57

Note. WR_G1 = Word recognition – Grade 1; PD_G1 = Phonological decoding – Grade 1; S_G1 = Spelling – Grade 1; Autoregressor_KG = the same reading and spelling variable measured at Kindergarten; RAN_KG = Rapid naming – Kindergarten; PA_KG = Phonological awareness – Kindergarten;

a

Negative regression weight;

b

Vocabulary was only assessed in preschool.

p < .10.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.