Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Learn Individ Differ. 2011 Feb 1;21(1):85–95. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.10.005

Table 8.

Incremental R2 of the Hierarchical Latent Variable Regression Models Predicting Reading and Spelling Skills at Grade 2 across U.S./Australia ad Scandinavia.

Steps U.S./Australia
Scandinavia
WR_G2 PD_G2 S_G2 WR_G2 PD_G2 S_G2
1 Autoregressor_G1 .741*** .719*** .716*** .661*** .561*** .621***
2 Vocabulary .001 .003* .000 .003 .002 .005
3 RAN_G1 .033*** .022*** .008*** .003 .037** .000
4 PA_G1 .000 .004* .004* .001 .008a .053
3 PA_G1 .000 .006* .005** .001 .012a .053
4 RAN_G1 .033*** .019*** .006** .003 .033** .000
Total R2 .78 .75 .73 .67 .61 .68

Note. WR_G2 = Word recognition – Grade 2; PD_G2 = Phonological decoding – Grade 2; S_G2 = Spelling – Grade 2; Autoregressor_G1 = the same reading and spelling variable measured at Grade 1; RAN_G1 = Rapid naming – Grade 1; PA_G1 = Phonological awareness – Grade 1;

a

Negative regression weight;

b

Vocabulary was only assessed in preschool.

p < .10.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.