Table 2.
Hierarchical Regression Model Predicting Kindergarten Social Inhibition
| Model | Coefficient | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | ΔR2 | R2 | 95% CI | F | b (SE) | 95% CI | β | t |
| Step 1 | .09* | .09 | −.01, .19 | 3.35* | ||||
| Fear of novelty | 0.01 (0.00) | 0.00, 0.01 | 0.22 | 2.28* | ||||
| Proximity to threat | −0.03 (0.03) | −0.09, 0.04 | −0.04 | −0.46 | ||||
| Attention to threat | 0.49 (0.27) | −0.04, 1.02 | 0.17 | 1.82† | ||||
| Step 2 | .05* | .14 | .03, .25 | 3.36* | ||||
| Fear of novelty | 0.01 (0.00) | 0.00, 0.01 | 0.23 | 2.49* | ||||
| Proximity to threat | −0.02 (0.03) | −0.08, 0.04 | −0.07 | −0.71 | ||||
| Attention to threat | 0.90 (0.32) | 0.28, 1.53 | 0.31 | 2.86** | ||||
| Attention to threat X Fear of novelty | −0.02 (0.02) | −0.05, 0.02 | −0.08 | −0.88 | ||||
| Attention to threat X Proximity to threat | −0.68 (0.30) | −1.28, −0.09 | −0.25 | −2.28* | ||||
| Simple Slopes | ||||||||
| Attention to threat at Proximity to threat = 0 | 0.90 (0.32) | 0.28, 1.53 | 0.31 | 2.86** | ||||
| Attention to threat at Proximity to threat = 1 | 0.22 (0.30) | −0.38, 0.80 | 0.08 | 0.46 | ||||
| Attention to threat at Proximity to threat = 2 | −0.47 (0.51) | −1.47, 0.54 | −0.16 | −0.92 | ||||
Note. CI = Confidence Interval. df = (3, 104), and (5, 102) for Steps 1 and 2, respectively. Simple slopes of Attention were examined by recentering proximity at the values listed in the table.
p < .10,
p < .05,
p < .01