Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Med. 2011 Mar;86(3):394–401. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31820924ea

Table 2.

Summary of Responses to Survey on Attitudes Toward and Types of Policies in Place for Sharing Facilities and Administrative (F&A) Cost Recovery

Survey part:
Respondent
Survey question Clinical and
Translational
Science Award
(CTSA)
institutions
No. (%)
National Council
of University
Research
Administrators
No. (%)
Total
No. (%)
Part I of Survey: All institutions Many academic leaders argue for implementing Facilities and Administrative (F&A) cost sharing strategies in order to make it easier for investigators to collaborate across disciplinary and departmental boundaries. Whether or not your institution has such a policy, please indicate your level of agreement with the following statement: “Having a standard policy for F&A cost recovery sharing helps investigators from multiple departments, units, or centers to engage in interdisciplinary research collaboration.”
      Strongly agree 17/37 (46.0) 99/217 (45.6) 116/254 (45.7)
      Agree somewhat 15/37 (40.5) 74/217 (34.1) 89/254 (35.0)
      Neutral 4/37 (10.8) 32/217 (14.8) 36/254 (14.2)
      Disagree 1/37 (2.7) 11/217 (5.1) 12/254 (4.7)
      Disagree strongly 0 1/217 (0.5) 1/254 (0.4)
Is there a standard, written policy at your institution for the sharing of F&A cost recovery among departments/units/centers when a research grant includes investigators from multiple departments?
      Yes 10/37 (27.0) 80/217 (36.9) 90/254 (35.4)
      No 24/37 (64.9) 119/217 (54.8) 143/254 (56.3)
      Unsure 3/37 (8.1) 18/217 (8.3) 21/254 (8.3)
Part II of Survey: Institutions with written policies Please choose the policy description below which, IN GENERAL, most closely resembles the policy at your institution:
      Sharing of F&A cost recovery is based on the distribution of work by investigator effort proposed in the project 4/10 (40.0) 33/75 (44.0) 33/75 (44.0)
      Sharing of F&A cost recovery is based on a formula taking into account a wide variety of factors and variables, including percentage of effort of personnel, allocation of space, use of resources, etc. 2/10 (20.0) 23/75 (30.7) 25/85 (29.4)
      Sharing of F&A cost recovery is negotiated on a case-by-case basis 3/10 (30.0) 18/75 (24) 21/85 (24.7)
      Sharing of F&A cost recovery is based on the physical space needed to conduct the research (e.g., office space, lab space, patient exam space) 1/10 (10.0) 1/75 (1.3)q 2/85 (2.4)
Does your institution's policy refer to sharing of F&A cost recovery only for grants with multiple principal investigators (PIs), or to any grant in which the co-investigators are based in multiple departments?
      Multiple PIs 0 12/75 (16.0) 12/85 (14.1)
      Either Multiple PIs or Co-Is in multiple departments 9/10 (90.0) 57/75 (76.0) 66/85 (77.6)
      Unsure 1/10 (10.0) 6/75 (8.0) 7/85 (8.2)
How satisfied are you with the policy at your institution?
      Very satisfied 1/10 (10.0) 25/75 (33.3) 26/85 (30.6)
      Somewhat satisfied 7/10 (70.0) 35/75 (46.7) 42/85 (49.4)
      Neutral 2/10 (20.0) 10/75 (13.3) 12/85 (14.1)
      Somewhat dissatisfied 0 5/75 (6.7) 5/85 (5.9)
      Very dissatisfied 0 0 0
      No experience with it 0 0 0