Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar;71(3):316–330. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03798.x

Table 1.

Median results for different methods in comparison with intermittent pulmonary thermodilution cardiac output

Differences with COpa Calculated 2SD-precision with
Bias 2SD-precision 2 SDpa = 10% 2 SDpa = 20% 2 SDpa = 30%
Method Number of observations l min−1 % % % % %
Indicator dilution
CCO-Vigilance 3439 0.03 0.55 27 25 18 6
Transpulmonary TD 818 0.43 7.74 21 18 7 0
Transpulmonary LiD 245 −0.03 −0.55 26 23 16 0
Fick
CO2-rebreathing 601 −0.25 −4.35 35 34 29 19
Pulse contour
Modelflow-calibrated 995 0.00 0.00 17 16 0 0
Modelflow-noncalibrated 924 0.31 5.63 31 29 23 7
PiCCOplus 1802 0.04 0.73 32 30 25 10
LiDCOplus 452 0.05 0.91 24 22 13 0
FloTrac-Vigileo 1777 0.25 4.55 41 40 36 29

COpa, cardiac output by intermittent pulmonary thermodilution.