Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 27;17(1):25–31. doi: 10.1089/ten.teb.2010.0489

Table 2.

Scaffold Options for Oral Mucosa Regeneration

Materials Pros Cons Representatives
Synthetic materials Reproducible; turnable structural and mechanical properties; unlimited availability Cyto- and biocompatibility Poly-(l)-lactic acid, polyglycolic acid
Acellular dermis Preservation of basement membrane Suboptimal cell ingrowth Deepidermized dermis, AlloDerm
ECM protein-based scaffolds Biocompatibility Suboptimal mechanical and physical properties Collagen, fibrin, hyaluronic acid
Hybrid scaffolds Improved biodegradable and biocompatible properties Complicated production process Combined natural and synthetic matrices

ECM, extracellular matrix.