Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 28.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychology. 2009 Mar;23(2):255–264. doi: 10.1037/a0012850

Table 2.

Neuropsychological Outcome Correlation Matrix

ID and outcome 1.1 1.2 1.3 2.1 2.2 2.3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.1 4.2 4.3 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4
1.1. Grooved pegboard
1.2. Digit Symbol .61
1.3. Trails Making Test–A (Trails A) .63 .62
2.1. Block design .48 .53 .43
2.2. Simple drawings .55 .46 .41 .54
2.3. Clock drawing .40 .38 .39 .49 .51
3.1. Trails Making Test–B (Trails B) .62 .61 .69 .49 .52 .40
3.2. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test .43 .48 .40 .47 .35 .42 .44
3.3. Executive Interview .47 .42 .36 .48 .35 .23 .40 .36
3.4. Stroop .60 .40 .50 .32 .32 .32 .60 .36 .23
4.1. California Verbal Learning Test .42 .49 .39 .38 .30 .38 .40 .38 .43 .36
4.2. Modified Rey-Osterrieth Figure .47 .32 .40 .49 .38 .25 .37 .22 .35 .29 .38
4.3. Logical Memory .28 .33 .24 .38 .34 .22 .32 .14 .33 .09 .41 .44
5.1. Boston Naming Test .54 .40 .36 .38 .48 .30 .36 .33 .38 .22 .34 .47 .33
5.2. Animal Fluency .38 .48 .27 .36 .33 .22 .39 .25 .27 .11 .35 .38 .37 .46
5.3. Letter Fluency .34 .47 .30 .22 .35 .22 .37 .24 .44 .12 .36 .23 .27 .41 .50
5.4. Spot-the-Word .06 .17 .09 .24 .28 .14 .12 .09 .23 .08 .18 .17 .19 .40 .16 .31

Note. For ID, x.y indicates the yth outcome of domain x. Domain 1 = information-processing speed; Domain 2 = visuospatial; Domain 3 = executive; Domain 4 = memory; Domain 5 = language.