Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 28;6(2):e17430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017430

Table 2. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for Sarcocheilichthys in Lake Biwa with (a) ‘species’ and (b) ‘habitat’ groupings.

Source of variation DF Sum of squares Variance components Percentage of variation F-statistics p
(a) mtDNA Between species 1 1.49 –0.005 –0.47 F CT = –0.0047 0.384
Between populations within species 12 19.46 0.042 4.03 F SC = 0.0407 0.046
Within populations 193 195.41 1.012 96.44 F ST = 0.0356 0.032
Microsatellite Between species 1 6.86 0.005 0.1 F CT = 0.0010 0.290
Between populations within species 11 67.47 0.039 0.77 F SC = 0.0077 <0.01
Within populations 349 1769.29 5.070 99.13 F ST = 0.0087 <0.001
(b) mtDNA Between habitats 1 5.45 0.042 3.9 F CT = 0.0390 0.047
Between populations within habitats 12 15.50 0.019 1.81 F SC = 0.0189 0.207
Within populations 193 195.41 1.012 94.28 F ST = 0.0572 0.032
Microsatellite Between habitats 1 6.07 –0.002 –0.04 F CT = –0.0004 0.434
Between populations within habitats 11 68.26 0.042 0.82 F SC = 0.0082 <0.001
Within populations 349 1769.29 5.070 99.22 F ST = 0.0078 <0.001