Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Inf Model. 2011 Jan 7;51(2):214–228. doi: 10.1021/ci100257s

Table 12.

Success rates for correctly ranking the low-, medium-, and high-affinity ligands in the PDBbind 2007 core set for the PHOENIX scoring function and 16 other commonly used scoring functions taken from the Cheng et al. study29.

Scoring function Success rate
(%)
PHOENIX 46.2
X-Score::HSScore 58.5
DS::PLP2 53.8
DrugScoreCSD 52.3
SYBYL::ChemScore 47.7
SYBYL::D-Score 46.2
SYBYL::G-Score 46.2
GOLD::ASP 43.1
DS::LUDI3 43.1
DS::Jain 41.5
DS::PMF 41.5
SYBYL::PMF-Score 38.5
GOLD::ChemScore 36.9
DS::LigScore2 35.4
GlideScore-XP 33.8
Number of Heavy
Atoms
32.3
SYBYL::F-Score 29.2
GOLD::GoldScore 23.1
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure