Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Inf Model. 2011 Jan 7;51(2):214–228. doi: 10.1021/ci100257s

Table 8.

Assessment of the ability of the PHOENIX scoring function to classify complexes into three binding affinity groups: low-affinity (pKd < 5.0), medium-affinity (5.0 ≤ pKd ≤ 8.0), and high-affinity (pKd > 8.0). The number of correctly categorized complexes and total number of complexes in each category, as well as the percentage of the correctly categorized complexes are presented for PHOENIX and the commonly used scoring functions take from the Wang et al. study26 for comparison purposes.

Scoring Function Low Medium High
PHOENIX 52/205=27% 417/417=100% 112/193=61%
SFSscore::met 88/191=46% 309/417=74% 86/192=45%
X-Score::HPScore 33/205=16% 358/402=89% 48/193=25%
X-Score::HMScore 41/205=20% 348/402=87% 65/193=34%
X-Score::HSScore 29/205=14% 350/402=87% 53/193=27%
DrugScore::Pair 24/205=12% 359/402=89% 45/193=23%
DrugScore::Surf 11/205=5% 362/402=90% 45/193=23%
DrugScore::Pair/Surf 24/205=12% 358/402=89% 47/193=24%
Sybyl::D-Score 0/205=0% 384/402=96% 2/193=1%
Sybyl::PMF-Score 0/196=0% 395/396=99% 0/193=0%
Sybyl::G-Score 12/205=6% 359/402=89% 30/193=16%
Sybyl::ChemScore 38/204=19% 349/400=87% 40/193=21%
Sybyl::F-Score 0/182=0% 362/362=100% 0/188=0%
Cerius2::LigScore 11/186=6% 340/366=93% 16/165=10%
Cerius2::PLP1 24/205=12% 364/401=91% 35/193=18%
Cerius2::PLP2 30/205=15% 363/402=90% 32/193=17%
Cerius2::PMF 0/202=0% 390/400=97% 3/193=2%
Cerius2::LUDI1 1/203=0% 379/394=96% 9/193=5%
Cerius2::LUDI2 6/205=3% 378/401=94% 15/193=8%
Cerius2::LUDI3 1/205=0% 387/402=96% 9/193=5%
GOLD::GoldScore 0/178=0% 331/339=98% 4/177=2%
GOLD::GoldScore_opt 3/200=1% 366/385=95% 11/187=6%
GOLD::ChemScore 8/177=5% 345/376=92% 37/188=20%
GOLD::ChemScore_opt 20/187=11% 346/386=90% 38/189=20%
HINT 2/205=1% 388/402=97% 11/193=6%
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure