Table 5.
Dependent variables | Independent variables | Estimate parameter | SD | Standardized coefficients | t value | p value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall satisfactiona | Constant’s parameter | 0.526 | 0.075 | 6.967 | 0.000 | |
Ease of use | 0.094 | 0.060 | 0.135 | 1.572 | 0.119 | |
Screen monitor quality | 0.005 | 0.063 | 0.950 | |||
Integration | −0.073 | 0.048 | −0.129 | −1.527 | 0.130 | |
Reliability | 0.016 | 0.063 | 0.024 | 0.252 | 0.802 | |
Accessibility | −0.034 | 0.056 | −0.057 | −0.614 | 0.541 | |
Perceived usefulness | 0.075 | 0.059 | 0.116 | 1.273 | 0.206 | |
Response time | 0.154 | 0.050 | 0.227 | 3.086 | 0.003 | |
Data quality | 0.253 | 0.069 | 0.348 | 3.680 | 0.000 | |
Quality of technical support | 0.008 | 0.055 | 0.012 | 0.137 | 0.891 | |
Confirmation of expectations | 0.207 | 0.055 | 0.309 | 3.765 | 0.000 | |
Radiologists | 0.167 | 0.095 | 0.109 | 1.762 | 0.082 | |
Medical specialists | 0.168 | 0.074 | 0.156 | 2.273 | 0.025 | |
Intended future useb | Constant’s parameter | 0.288 | 0.117 | 2.455 | 0.016 | |
Overall satisfaction | 0.567 | 0.099 | 0.535 | 5.695 | 0.000 | |
Overall benefits | 0.154 | 0.074 | 0.177 | 2.079 | 0.040 | |
Confirmation of expectations | 0.059 | 0.067 | 0.087 | 0.879 | 0.318 | |
Radiologists | 0.106 | 0.112 | 0.066 | 0.943 | 0.348 | |
Specialists | −0.086 | 0.074 | −0.082 | −1.166 | 0.246 |
aModel’s overall significance: F = 21.24, p = 0.000, R2 = 0.743, R2 adjusted = 0.708
bModel’s overall significance: F = 22.37, p = 0.000, R2 = 0.500, R2 adjusted = 0.477