Table 3:
Inquiry | Didactic | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Homogeneous | Heterogeneous | Homogeneous | Heterogeneous | ||
High-level achievement | |||||
Instructional method | 68.9 ± 0.13a | 64.9 ± 0.12 | |||
Group composition | 69.4 ± 0.12 | 68.6 ± 0.14 | 62.1 ± 0.12b | 67.3 ± 0.13 | |
Initial reasoning abilities | |||||
High | 72.5 ± 0.11 | 78.0 ± 0.11 | 70.1 ± 0.09 | 73.5 ± 0.10 | |
Medium | 67.1 ± 0.13 | 64.7 ± 0.08 | 60.0 ± 0.09 | 67.4 ± 0.12 | |
Low | 64.2 ± 0.08 | 56.3 ± 0.14 | 47.4 ± 0.09 | 59.0 ± 0.13c | |
Low-level achievement | |||||
Instructional method | 61.6 ± 0.13 | 65.6 ± 0.16 | |||
Group composition | 62.4 ± 0.11 | 61.0 ± 0.14 | 58.5 ± 0.14 | 71.8 ± 0.14d | |
Initial reasoning abilities | |||||
High | 65.0 ± 0.10 | 68.4 ± 0.13 | 65.9 ± 0.11 | 78.8 ± 0.10 | |
Medium | 58.9 ± 0.10 | 54.9 ± 0.13 | 56.9 ± 0.14 | 69.0 ± 0.16 | |
Low | 65.6 ± 0.17 | 55.9 ± 0.13 | 44.4 ± 0.08 | 64.7 ± 0.15 | |
Reasoning transfer | |||||
Instructional method | 2.89 ± 1.39e | 2.52 ± 1.32 | |||
Group composition | 3.00 ± 1.41 | 2.79 ± 1.38 | 2.18 ± 1.19 | 2.82 ± 1.37f | |
Initial reasoning abilities | |||||
High | 3.44 ± 1.26 | 3.65 ± 1.12 | 3.08 ± 0.86 | 3.38 ± 1.41 | |
Medium | 2.33 ± 1.23 | 2.31 ± 1.38 | 1.67 ± 0.98 | 2.80 ± 1.14 | |
Low | 4.00 ± 2.00g | 1.89 ± 0.93 | 1.40 ± 1.14 | 2.08 ± 1.24 |
Values are percentages (mean ± SD) for high-level Bloom's items and low-level Bloom's items. Reasoning transfer items are reported as total points (mean ± SD) out of a possible six items.
aInquiry sections outperformed didactic sections (p = 0.04).
bHomogeneous groups within didactic instruction performed lower that homogeneous groups within inquiry instruction (p = 0.02).
cLow-reasoning students had higher scores in heterogeneous groups than homogeneous groups within didactic instruction (p = 0.04).
dHeterogeneous groups outperformed homogeneous groups within didactic instruction (p < 0.01).
eInquiry sections significantly outperformed didactic sections (p = 0.01).
fHeterogeneous groups outperformed homogeneous groups in didactic sections (p = 0.02).
gLow reasoners in homogeneous inquiry groups outperformed low reasoners in heterogeneous inquiry groups (p = 0.02) and low reasoners in homogeneous didactic groups (p < 0.01).