Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 9;20(1):95–106. doi: 10.1002/pro.540

Table V.

Summary of the Pocket-Prediction Accuracies of Various Methods. Prediction Accuracy of MolSite for the 48 Target Proteins, Which were Used for the Validation of LIGSITE, PASS, Q-site Finder, and SURFNET, as Shown in Appendix A

Method MolSite MolSite FIND SITE LIG SITE Meta Pocket LIG SITE PASS Q-site Finder SURFNET
No of Pocketsa Top 1 Top 1 Top 5 Top 5 Top 1 Top 1 Top 1 Top 1 Top 1
Distance (D) Dc Dmin Dc Dc Dmin Dmin Dmin Dmin Dmin
D < 8 Åb 97.92 97.92 —s
D < 6 Åb 97.92 97.92
D < 5 Åb 91.67 97.92
D < 4 Åb 87.50 97.92 70.9c 51.3c 83.0d 81.0d 58.0d 75.0d 42.0d
D < 3 Åb 68.75 97.92

The values in this table are in %. This prediction is based on the Savg score. Dc: the distance between the center of the predicted ligand-binding site and the center of the bound ligand. Dmin: the minimum distance between the center of the predicted binding site and any atom of the bound ligand.

a

Number of pockets indicates the number of predicted pockets used for the analysis. If one of the predicted pockets is correct, then the prediction is counted as a successful prediction.

b

The 48 target proteins were used.

c

Reference28.

d

Reference1.