Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 2.
Published in final edited form as: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Dec 11;65(2):137–143. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.087379

Table 2.

Variance of the area random effect estimated from separate two-level (individuals, areas) empty multilevel survival models for CHD incidence (adjusted for age and gender), GAZEL cohort, 1990–2000, men and women

Full population Intermediate or low urbanicity degree High urbanicity degree
Full sample
 Geographical scale
  Municipality level 0.235 (p=0.32) 0.083 (p=0.43) 0.262 (p=0.32)
  County level 0.048 (p=0.19) 0.001 (p=0.45) 0.132 (p=0.06)
  Region level 0.038 (p=0.04) 0.001 (p=0.50) 0.135 (p=0.003)
Among males
 Geographical scale
  Municipality level 0.150 (p=0.39) 0.021 (p=0.39) 0.204 (p=0.370)
  County level 0.044 (p=0.21) 0.001 (p=0.45) 0.103 (p=0.110)
  Region level 0.040 (p=0.055) 0.001 (p=0.49) 0.125 (p=0.008)