Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 28;61(584):e125–e133. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X561249

Table 2.

Critical appraisal of selected studies.

Study Well-defined question posed in answerable form Comprehensive description of competing alternatives Effectiveness of programme or service established All important and relevant costs and consequences for each alternative identified Costs and consequences measured accurately in appropriate physical units Costs and consequences valued credibly Costs and consequences adjusted for differential timing Incremental analysis of costs and consequences of alternatives performed Allowance made for uncertainty in the estimates of costs and consequences Presentation and discussion of study results included all issues of concern to users
UK Beam
 Trial Team17

Cochrane et al18

Hurley et al19

Hollinghurst et al20 Productivity data not included in analysis due to missing values Missing costs for interventions, labour costs only Minimal discussion

Gusi et al21 No secondary healthcare costs included Unit costs only reported if significant difference between groups No references cited for unit costs

Handley et al22 No healthcare costs as no difference between groups Unit costs not reported, components listed Sources not reported inferred but not explicit cost year Sensitivity analysis carried out; 10% missing values

Sevick et al23 Sources not identified for unit costs

Munro et al24 Treatment of control group not explicit No measure of exercise. Primary care and personal costs not collected, only programme costs Sources not identified for unit costs; little detail given Weaknesses not well highlighted; practical (funder) considerations not mentioned

Dzator et al25 Programme costs only; no quality-of-life measures Unit costs not reported, components and methods isted Sources not identified currency and year not specified

Elley et al11 Not all sources cited

Dalziel et al10 Not all sources cited

Isaacs et al26 Control only followed for 6 months; intervention 12 months Intervention was not more effective than control

Elley et al27