Included study |
Design |
Patient selection |
Well-defined outcome |
Protection Against Confounding |
Protection against bias |
Adequate power |
Proper variables |
Proper statistical methods |
Reported included and excluded subjects |
Global assessment |
Global assessment: emergency department vs. non-emergency department infection rate |
Dipietrantonio 1986 [27] |
Retrospective chart review |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
High risk of bias |
High risk of bias |
Ferguson 1988 [28] |
Retrospective chart review |
Poor quality |
Good quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Not done |
High risk of bias |
N/A |
Chiang 2000 [25] |
Retrospective chart review |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Not done |
High risk of bias |
N/A |
Citak 2002 [26] |
Prospective observational cohort |
Unclear |
Good quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
High risk of bias |
High risk of bias |
Nagashima 2006 [31] |
Retrospective chart review |
Good quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Unclear |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Moderate risk of bias |
Moderate risk of bias |
Trick 2006 [32] |
Prospective observational cohort |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
High risk of bias |
High risk of bias |
Guzzo 2007 [34] and Xiao 2006 [35] |
Prospective observational cohort |
Unclear |
Good quality |
Good quality |
Poor quality |
Good quality |
Good quality |
Poor quality |
Not done |
Moderate risk of bias |
N/A |
Yilmaz 2007 [33] |
Prospective observational cohort |
Unclear |
Good quality |
Good quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Good quality |
Not done |
High risk of bias |
High risk of bias |
Koh 2008 [30] and Gowardman 2008 [29] |
Prospective observational cohort |
Poor quality |
Good quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Poor quality |
Good quality |
Good quality |
Good quality |
Moderate risk of bias |
High risk of bias |