Table 2.

Cluster maxima from the behavior PLS (bPLS) analysis for the control group (LV 1, see Figure 2A).

Lag	x	y	z	Lat.	Anat.	BA	BSR	Clust.	ROI
0	−44	44	16	L	GFm	46	5.22	12
0	28	6	44	R	GFm	6	6.17	12
0	24	−67	−13	R	GF	19	7.16	54
0	−36	−78	−10	L	GOm	19	7.89	58
1	−40	48	23	L	GFm	9/46	6.60	22	ii
1	−67	9	29	L	GFi	44/6	8.06	20	i
1	28	6	48	R	GFm	6	5.44	11
1	−63	−46	10	L	GTs	22	6.34	18
1	44	−28	53	R	LPi	40	5.27	30
1	−51	−30	31	L	Gsm	40	6.67	44
1	32	−48	50	R	LPs	7	4.84	12
1	−24	−55	58	L	LPs	7	5.42	27
1	−24	−78	−13	L	GF/GL	18	7.49	108
1	28	−78	−13	R	GF/GL	18	6.44	75
2	−44	26	−18	L	GTs	38	6.78	21
2	−51	−29	35	L	LPi	40	6.00	24
2	32	−56	54	R	LPs	7	6.10	15
2	−24	−59	62	L	PCu	7	8.14	17
2	8	−63	66	R	PCu	7	5.21	11
2	−48	−63	−10	L	GOm	37/19	6.17	28
3	−40	−66	−3	L	GOm	19	6.33	11
2	−44	−84	23	L	GO	19	6.44	26
2	28	−90	−16	R	GF	18	6.81	91
2	−8	−98	−9	L	GL	18	6.07	11
3	48	−64	−27	R	Cereb		7.44	58

These regions demonstrated a positive correlation with task accuracy. Cluster threshold (BSR) was >4, corresponding approximately to p < 0.0001, with minimum size of 10 voxels. All column headings and abbreviations as in Table 1.

ROI, region of interest (roman numerals correspond to regions highlighted in Figure 2).