Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 16;43(1):239–257. doi: 10.3758/s13428-010-0031-2

Table 6.

Comparison of eye-movement measures computed with algorithms that use individual and task-specific, respectively, only task-specific velocity thresholds

Measure Statistic Overall Reading Search Ad exploration
Number of fixations Mean difference –1.53 –2.78 –.32 –1.26
MAD 19.27 46.15 4.16 5.82
MAPD .21 .27 .18 .18
Correlation .90 .55 .92 .84
Fixation durations (ms) Mean difference 1.24 –.02 –2.14 4.65
MAD 56.98 71.15 55.85 45.26
MAPD .22 .26 .22 .19
Correlation .14 –.08 .38 .07
Saccade size (°) Mean difference –.01 –.00 –.06 .02
MAD .56 .34 .63 .70
MAPD .17 .18 .17 .16
Correlation .89 .59 .82 .69

Note: The reported statistics are: mean difference: the overall mean for the eye-movement measure in question, computed using individual specific velocity thresholds minus the overall mean computed using the average velocity threshold for individuals, within a specific task; MAD Mean absolute deviation of the measures computed using individual and average velocity thresholds; MAPD Mean absolute percentage deviation of the measures computed using individual and average velocity thresholds; Correlation Correlation coefficient of the measures computed using individual and average velocity thresholds