Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 3;7(3):e1001323. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001323

Table 5. Comparison of association results for loci associated with systemic lupus erythematosus described in Gateva et. al [7], stratified by anti–dsDNA autoantibody production.

SLE versus healthy controls anti–dsDNA + versus healthy controls anti–dsDNA – versus healthy controls Case Only Analysis
(1717 cases, 4813 controls) (811 cases, 4813 controls) (906 cases, 4813 controls) Test of hetero-geneity (811 anti–dsDNA+ cases versus 906 anti–dsDNA – cases)
Gene SNP OR (95% CI) p(λGC = 1.080) OR (95% CI) p(λGC = 1.048) OR (95% CI) p(λGC = 1.045) p OR (95% CI) p(λGC = 1.000)
PTPN22 rs2476601 1.26 (1.1–1.43) 9.5E-04 1.41 (1.19–1.66) 8.7E-05 1.14 (0.96–1.35) 0.15 0.078 1.24 (1.00–1.53) 0.047
FCGR2A rs1801274 0.84 (0.77–0.91) 4.7E-05 0.83 (0.74–0.92) 0.0010 0.84 (0.76–0.94) 0.0022 0.80 0.99 (0.87–1.14) 0.92
OX40L rs2205960 1.24 (1.13–1.36) 1.7E-05 1.28 (1.13–1.44) 1.6E-04 1.22 (1.09–1.38) 0.0012 0.64 1.06 (0.91–1.23) 0.48
IL10 rs3024505 1.25 (1.13–1.39) 4.8E-05 1.29 (1.12–1.49) 4.1E-04 1.24 (1.08–1.41) 0.0022 0.66 1.04 (0.87–1.23) 0.69
STAT4 rs7574865 1.49 (1.36–1.63) 3.6E-16 1.77 (1.57–1.99) 2.0E-20 1.26 (1.12–1.41) 2.4E-04 <0.0005 1.41 (1.21–1.63) 7.9E-06
PXK rs6445975 1.14 (1.05–1.25) 0.0045 1.15 (1.02–1.29) 0.027 1.14 (1.02–1.28) 0.027 0.95 1.01 (0.88–1.17) 0.87
BANK1 rs10516487 0.93 (0.85–1.01) 0.11 0.85 (0.76–0.96) 0.011 1.01 (0.9–1.13) 0.92 0.048 0.85 (0.73–0.99) 0.030
TNIP1 rs10036748 1.26 (1.15–1.38)a 2.5E-06a 1.30 (1.15–1.46)b 3.0E-05b 1.23 (1.09–1.38)c 7.9E-04c 0.51 1.08 (0.93–1.25)d 0.32d
PTTG1 rs2431099 0.84 (0.78–0.91)a 1.1E-04a 0.78 (0.70–0.87)b 1.4E-05b 0.91 (0.82–1.01)c 0.072c 0.052 0.87 (0.76–0.99)d 0.037d
HLA-DR2 rs9271366 1.27 (1.13–1.41) 7.4E-05 1.36 (1.17–1.57) 7.1E-05 1.18 (1.03–1.36) 0.024 0.19 1.16 (0.97–1.39) 0.11
HLA-DR3 rs2187668 1.91 (1.71–2.14) 1.0E-27 2.23 (1.94–2.57) 5.8E-28 1.62 (1.4–1.87) 1.2E-10 0.002 1.40 (1.18–1.67) 1.4E-04
UHRF1BP1 rs9462015 1.27 (1.16–1.38) 1.8E-07 1.27 (1.14–1.42) 5.3E-05 1.27 (1.14–1.42) 2.4E-05 1.00 1 (0.87–1.15) 0.96
PRDM1 rs6568431 1.19 (1.1–1.3) 4.2E-05 1.19 (1.06–1.32) 0.0026 1.2 (1.08–1.33) 8.5E-04 0.88 0.98 (0.86–1.12) 0.77
ATG5 rs633724 1.13 (1.04–1.22) 0.0069 1.18 (1.06–1.32) 0.0043 1.08 (0.97–1.2) 0.16 0.27 1.1 (0.96–1.26) 0.19
TNFAIP3 rs2327832 1.2 (1.08–1.32) 5.4E-04 1.27 (1.12–1.44) 2.8E-04 1.13 (1–1.28) 0.065 0.19 1.12 (0.96–1.31) 0.14
JAZF1 rs1635852 1.15 (1.06–1.24) 0.0012 1.21 (1.09–1.35) 6.2E-04 1.09 (0.99–1.21) 0.091 0.18 0.89 (0.78–1.02) 0.091
IRF5 rs10488631 1.74 (1.55–1.95) 1.9E-19 1.92 (1.66–2.22) 7.2E-18 1.57 (1.35–1.82) 6.2E-09 0.056 1.23 (1.03–1.48) 0.022
BLK rs2248932 1.24 (1.14–1.35) 2.7E-06 1.28 (1.14–1.43) 2.9E-05 1.2 (1.08–1.34) 0.0011 0.44 1.06 (0.92–1.22) 0.39
KIAA1542 rs4963128 0.84 (0.77–0.92) 1.9E-04 0.75 (0.67–0.85) 3.9E-06 0.92 (0.82–1.03) 0.14 0.014 0.81 (0.70–0.93) 0.0034
ITGAM rs9888739 1.53 (1.37–1.71) 3.4E-13 1.8 (1.56–2.07) 1.1E-15 1.32 (1.15–1.53) 2.1E-04 0.003 1.35 (1.14–1.61) 7.0E-04
UBE2L3 rs5754217 1.22 (1.1–1.35) 1.7E-04 1.38 (1.21–1.57) 1.9E-06 1.09 (0.95–1.24) 0.22 0.011 1.28 (1.08–1.51) 0.0038
IRAK1 rs2269368 1.19 (1.06–1.33) 6.1E-03 1.2 (1.03–1.4) 2.2E-02 1.17 (1.01–1.35) 0.045 0.80 1.02 (0.85–1.23) 0.82

a imputed analysis, λGC = 1.118.

b imputed analysis, λGC = 1.071.

c imputed analysis, λGC = 1.066.

d imputed analysis, λGC = 1.001.