Table 3.
Table 3 Large consistent effect sizes from meta-analyses of brain imaging studies in patients versus controls
Effect sizevs. controls | Different from relatives | Evident at first episode | Specificity vs. affective disorder | Other issues | |
sMRI regional brain volumes | Up to 0.86, some with heterogeneity (Wright et al, 76) | Yes, at least hippocampus and ventricles | Yes, at least hippocampus and ventricles | Amygdala volume may discriminate but may depend on age and treatment | Pattern recognition methods may be more powerful |
Hypofrontality | 0.64 at rest; | Yes | Yes | DLPFC activity | Performance level |
1.13 when active | possibly | needs to be | |||
(Zakzanis and Heinrichs, 85) | allowed for | ||||
Mismatch | 0.99 | Possible | Possible, but some | Possible | |
negativity | (Umbricht and | possible | |||
Krljes, 98) | progression | ||||
sMRI – structural magnetic resonance imaging; DLPFC – dorsolateral prefrontal cortex |