Table 4.
Table 4 Summary of research findings
| - Particular psychotic symptoms are not in themselves strong associates or predictors of schizophrenia, because of their relative rarity, the difficulties in reliably eliciting them and their lack of specificity. |
| - Developmental abnormalities (social, sensorimotor, intellectual), whether elicited in the history or on examination, merit formal evaluation as potential diagnostic aids, but these may simply be trait markers. |
| - A number of genetic markers of schizophrenia have been identified, but the impact of such testing in clinical practice needs to be established. |
| - Of currently available technological approaches, structural brain imaging looks most promising as a diagnostic aid, and in the early detection of psychosis (at least within high risk populations). |
| - Functional imaging should be more sensitive, but is more expensive and technically demanding, and may have particular value in differential diagnosis and response prediction. |
| Imaging and other approaches should be further improved by genotyping and/or other biomarkers as they become available - although with each additional test false negatives tend to become more of a problem. |
| - Ideally, clinically significant test results should be examined in clinical trials to establish whether thetime and expense involved impacts favourably on patient outcome. |