Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Oct 13.
Published in final edited form as: Structure. 2010 Oct 13;18(10):1270–1279. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2010.07.009

Table 1.

Table X-ray diffraction data collection and refinement statistics a

Data collection Form I Form II
Space group C2 C2
Cell dimensions
a, b, c (Å) 501.0, 276.3, 161.0 223.7, 283.0, 160.8
alpha,beta,gamma (°) 90.00, 106.8, 90.00 90.0, 133.9, 90.0
Resolution (Å) 50.0-3.80 (3.94-3.80) 50.0-3.70 (3.90-3.70)
Rmergeb 0.181 (0.390) 0.117 (0.476)
I/σ 9.0 (1.6) 7.4 (2.3)
Completeness (%) 97.0 (81.4) 99.5(99.4)
Redundancy 3.2 (2.5) 3.2 (3.3)
Refinement
Resolution (Å) 50.0-3.80 50.0-3.70
No. reflections 199,545 76576
Rwork/Rfree (%)c 36.5/37.1 27.7/28.3
No. atoms
Protein (one subunit) 3849 3849
Ligand/ion (ADP) 27
B-factors2)
Equator domain 70.4 108.5
Median domain 108.1 135.0
Apical domain 112.0 137.2
Lid domain 118.8 147.1
r.m.s. deviations
Bond lengths (Å) 0.01 0.01
Bond angles (°) 1.41 1.48
a

Corresponding parameters for the highest-resolution shell are shown in parentheses.

b

RmergehΣi|Iih −<Ih>| / ΣhΣi<Ih>, where <Ih> is the mean intensity of the observation Iih reflection h.

c

Rwork =Σ(‖Fp(obs)| − |Fp(calc)‖) / Σ|Fp(obs)|; Rfree = R factor for a selected subset (5%) of the reflections that was not included in prior refinement calculations.