Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Neurol. 2010 Aug 9;67(12):1473–1484. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.201

Table 5.

Association of AD with CR1, CLU, and PICALM SNPs stratified by APOE ε4 carrier status and testing statistical interaction with APOE ε4 carrier status in Caucasian cohorts

Gene/SNP APOE e4 (−) APOE e4 (+) SNP*APOE interaction
OR 95% CI P-value OR 95% CI P-value OR 95% CI P-value
CR1
 rs3818361 1.10 1.02 – 1.19 0.0170 1.14 1.03 – 1.26 0.0120 1.01 0.99 – 1.03 0.2800
 rs6701713 1.10 1.01 – 1.19 0.0210 1.14 1.03 – 1.26 0.0110 1.01 0.99 – 1.04 0.2800
 rs1408077 1.06 1.00 – 1.12 0.0360 1.15 1.03 – 1.27 0.0099 1.06 0.97 – 1.16 0.1900

CLU
 rs7012010 1.10 1.00 – 1.20 0.0430 1.05 1.00 – 1.10 0.0640 1.03 0.94 – 1.12 0.5100
 rs3087554 1.01 0.90 – 1.14 0.8800 1.00 0.84 – 1.18 0.9700 1.00 0.82 – 1.22 1.0000
 rs11136000 0.91 0.84 – 0.98 0.0150 0.93 0.84 – 1.03 0.1700 0.98 0.92 – 1.06 0.6500
 rs9331888 1.03 0.93 – 1.14 0.5300 0.92 0.80 – 1.05 0.1900 0.89 0.77 – 1.04 0.1400
 rs7982 0.87 0.79 – 0.97 0.0092 0.92 0.81 – 1.05 0.2200 1.06 0.91 – 1.24 0.4800

PICALM
 rs532470 0.99 0.92 – 1.08 0.8900 1.12 1.01 – 1.24 0.0300 1.11 0.98 – 1.25 0.1000
 rs592297 1.04 0.97 – 1.11 0.3200 0.90 0.79 – 1.03 0.1200 0.85 0.73 – 1.00 0.0480
 rs677909 0.99 0.91 – 1.08 0.8000 0.86 0.77 – 0.96 0.0062 0.86 0.75 – 0.98 0.0260
 rs636848 0.96 0.88 – 1.06 0.4400 1.07 0.95 – 1.21 0.2700 1.07 0.92 – 1.23 0.3900
 rs541458 0.99 0.91 – 1.08 0.8100 0.86 0.77 – 0.96 0.0066 0.86 0.75 – 0.98 0.0270
 rs561655 0.97 0.89 – 1.06 0.5000 0.83 0.75 – 0.93 0.0009 0.82 0.73 – 0.93 0.0024
 rs543293 1.00 0.92 – 1.09 0.9800 0.83 0.74 – 0.93 0.0011 0.81 0.71 – 0.93 0.0026
 rs7941541 0.98 0.90 – 1.08 0.7300 0.90 0.79 – 1.02 0.0990 0.89 0.79 – 0.99 0.0360
 rs3851179 0.99 0.91 – 1.07 0.7300 0.86 0.77 – 0.95 0.0034 0.84 0.74 – 0.95 0.0068

Abbreviations are as in Table 3.

Meta-analysis P-values and odds ratios estimated under an additive model using logistic regression without covariates among subjects with no APOE ε4 alleles [APOE ε4 (−)] and among individuals with at least one APOE ε4 alleles (APOE ε4 (+)).

Meta-analysis P-values and ORs for the interaction term (SNP*APOE interaction) were evaluated using logistic regression under an additive model including terms for the two main effects (SNP minor allele dosage and the presence of at least one APOE ε4 allele) and their interaction.