Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 4;6(3):e14748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014748

Table 1. Comparison of conventionally and BED-estimated incidence in two cohorts.

Time Period PY No. at risk Estimated No. of incident infections Annualized incidence/100 PY
Conventional BED Conventional (CI) BED (CI)
Thailand military conscript cohort
Months
5 324 867 2 2.0 0.62 (0.00–1.48) 1.49 (0.00–3.57)
17 660 662 9 9.5 1.38 (0.47–2.29) 1.48 (0.02–2.93)
23 207 472 3 1.2 1.47 (0.00–3.15) 1.18 (0.00–3.49)
Subtotal 1191 14 12.7 1.19 (0.56–1.82) 1.43(0.36–2.49)
BMA injection drug user cohort
Months
8 709 942 52 34 7.91 (5.68–10.15) 5.22 (4.65–9.87)
16 620 805 38 34 6.53 (4.39–8.67) 5.85 (0.48–11.22)
24 515 668 30 28 6.19 (3.90–8.47) 5.77 (0.00–14.43)
Subtotal 1844 120 96 6.96 (5.67–8.25) 5.49 (2.22–8.76)

PY, person-years; CI, 95% confidence interval; BMA, Bangkok Metropolitan authority.