Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dent Mater. 2010 Dec 17;27(4):364–370. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.016

Table 1.

Summary of the estimated fatigue parameters of the Materials S and PC using different models and the proportion of the specimens failing at lower stress than predicted by each model.

Material S Material PC
Calculation Method Stress Rate Groups Stress Rate Below Predicted (%) n ln B Below Predicted (%) n ln B
All points All four rates Actual 48.3 35.9 -11.1 34.2 12.4 9.61
Target 48.3 35.5 -10.8 34.2 12.4 9.61
Two middle rates Actual 49.2 24.4 -4.87 46.7 6.8 13.3
Target 49.2 24.6 -4.84 46.7 6.8 13.3
Two extreme rates Actual 50.0 37.8 -11.9 35.0 13.5 9.21
Target 50.8 37.3 -11.5 35.0 13.5 9.21
Median points All four rates Actual 46.7 38.4 -12.7 54.2 13.1 10.4
Target 46.7 38.2 -12.4 54.2 13.1 10.4
Two middle rates Actual 45.0 23.6 -4.86 57.5 8.2 13.6
Target 45.0 23.7 -4.79 57.5 8.2 13.6
Two extreme rates Actual 53.3 41.1 -13.3 46.7 14.0 9.61
Target 53.3 40.9 -13.1 46.7 14.0 9.61
Homologous points All four rates Actual 48.3 32.8 -9.84 33.0 13.7 8.63
Target 47.5 32.6 -9.59 33.0 13.7 8.63
Two middle rates Actual 48.3 20.5 -2.87 33.0 12.6 8.92
Target 49.2 20.6 -2.79 33.0 12.6 8.92
Two extreme rates Actual 48.3 35.5 -11.1 36.6 13.8 8.99
Target 47.5 35.2 -10.9 36.6 13.8 8.99