Table 1.
Summary of the estimated fatigue parameters of the Materials S and PC using different models and the proportion of the specimens failing at lower stress than predicted by each model.
| Material S | Material PC | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calculation Method | Stress Rate Groups | Stress Rate | Below Predicted (%) | n | ln B | Below Predicted (%) | n | ln B |
| All points | All four rates | Actual | 48.3 | 35.9 | -11.1 | 34.2 | 12.4 | 9.61 |
| Target | 48.3 | 35.5 | -10.8 | 34.2 | 12.4 | 9.61 | ||
| Two middle rates | Actual | 49.2 | 24.4 | -4.87 | 46.7 | 6.8 | 13.3 | |
| Target | 49.2 | 24.6 | -4.84 | 46.7 | 6.8 | 13.3 | ||
| Two extreme rates | Actual | 50.0 | 37.8 | -11.9 | 35.0 | 13.5 | 9.21 | |
| Target | 50.8 | 37.3 | -11.5 | 35.0 | 13.5 | 9.21 | ||
| Median points | All four rates | Actual | 46.7 | 38.4 | -12.7 | 54.2 | 13.1 | 10.4 |
| Target | 46.7 | 38.2 | -12.4 | 54.2 | 13.1 | 10.4 | ||
| Two middle rates | Actual | 45.0 | 23.6 | -4.86 | 57.5 | 8.2 | 13.6 | |
| Target | 45.0 | 23.7 | -4.79 | 57.5 | 8.2 | 13.6 | ||
| Two extreme rates | Actual | 53.3 | 41.1 | -13.3 | 46.7 | 14.0 | 9.61 | |
| Target | 53.3 | 40.9 | -13.1 | 46.7 | 14.0 | 9.61 | ||
| Homologous points | All four rates | Actual | 48.3 | 32.8 | -9.84 | 33.0 | 13.7 | 8.63 |
| Target | 47.5 | 32.6 | -9.59 | 33.0 | 13.7 | 8.63 | ||
| Two middle rates | Actual | 48.3 | 20.5 | -2.87 | 33.0 | 12.6 | 8.92 | |
| Target | 49.2 | 20.6 | -2.79 | 33.0 | 12.6 | 8.92 | ||
| Two extreme rates | Actual | 48.3 | 35.5 | -11.1 | 36.6 | 13.8 | 8.99 | |
| Target | 47.5 | 35.2 | -10.9 | 36.6 | 13.8 | 8.99 | ||