Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Med Chem. 2011 Feb 14;54(5):1441–1448. doi: 10.1021/jm1014555

Table 2.

Pharmacological evaluation of 3,5,5-trimethylmorpholine analogs as non-competitive nicotinic antagonistsa,b

Compd AD50 (mg/kg)
Tail-flick Hot-plate Locomotion Hypothermia CPP
2c 1.2 (1–1.18) 15 (6–19) 4.9 (0.9–46) 9.2 (4–23) 0.35
(S,S)-4ac 0.2 (0.06–0.7) 1.0 (0.2–2.2) 0.9 (0.2–5.7) 1.5 (0.15–2.6) 0.1
(R,R)-4ac 2.5 (1.2–3.6) 10.3 (5.7–17.1) IA IA NT
(S,S)-5a 0.036 (0.012–0.1) IA IA IA NT
(R,R)-5a 1.26 (0.39–4.1) 3.9 (0.8–19) IA IA NT
(S,S)-5b 0.02 (0.008–0.03) IA 4.7 (1.2–19) IA NT
(S,S)-5c 0.006 (0.003–0.01) IA 2.1 (0.9–4.8) IA NT
(S,S)-5d 0.13 (0.03–0.6) IA 3.8 (1.2–12) IA NT
(S,S)-5e 0.029 (0.004–0.23) IA IA IA 0.025
(S,S)-5f 0.056 (0.018–0.17) IA IA IA 0.03
(S,S)-5g 0.018 (0.009–0.03) 9.6 (1.2–77) 2.7 (0.7–10.5) 2.5 (1.6–3.9) NT
(S,S)-5h 0.017 (0.002–0.15) IA 0.49(0.3–6.6) IA NT
a

Results were expressed as AD50 (mg/kg) ± confidence limits (CL) or % effect at the highest dose tested. Dose-response curves were determined using a minimum of four different doses of test compound, and at least eight mice were used per dose group. IA = AD50 > 20 mg/kg.

b

NT = not tested.

c

Taken from reference 13.