Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar;13(3):185–191. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00269.x

Table 2.

Combined data from all users comparing conventional 2-D ultrasound (US) with the InVision™ System at each angle in respect to the 2-D US plane

Non-guided (n= 30 attempts) InVision™ (n= 30 attempts) P-value
Hits at 0°, n 12 27 <0.001

Hits at 45°, n 12 29 <0.001

Hits at 90°, n 8 23 <0.001

n= 30 attempts at antenna placement per group (non-guided vs. InVision™ System) per angle (0°, 45°, 90°), where 0° is parallel to or ‘in plane’ with the US image and 90° is orthogonal to or ‘out of plane’ with the US image