Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 7.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Oct 30;199(6):680.e1–680.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.07.027

Table 3.

Urethral support analyzed by mild, moderate, and severe ISI score categories

Symptom severity
ISI range
Mild, 0–6
(n = 104)
Moderate, 7–16
(n = 51)
Severe, 17–29
(n = 40)
ANOVA
P value
Urethral support
 Q-tip rest (degrees) −6.1 ± 0.1a −2.4 ± 0.2 1.7 ± 0.3a < .001
 Q-tip Kegel (degrees) −20.3 ± 0.2a,b −13.9 ± 0.3b −8.9 ± 0.4a .001
 Q-tip strain (degrees) 24.9 ± 1.8 29.2 ± 2.9 31.3 ± 3.3 .068
 POP-Q point Aa (cm) −1.0 ± 0.1a,b −0.6 ± 0.1b −0.5 ± 0.1a .004
 POP-Q point Ba (cm) −0.9 ± 0.1a,b −0.5 ± 0.1b −0.4 ± 0.1a .005
 GH rest (cm) 2.8 ± 0.1a,b 3.3 ± 0.1b 3.2 ± 0.2a .007
 GH Kegel (cm) 2.4 ± 0.1a,b 2.8 ± 0.1b 2.8 ± 0.1a .012
 GH strain (cm) 3.4 ± 0.1a,b 4.1 ± 0.1b 3.9 ± 0.2a .004

Values reported as means ± SE.

a

Pair-wise: mild vs severe (P < .01).

b

Pair-wise: mild vs moderate (P < .01).