Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Inorg Biochem. 2011 Mar 1;105(3):264–272. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2010.11.015

CYCLOOXYGENASE REACTION MECHANISM OF PROSTAGLANDIN H SYNTHASE FROM DEUTERIUM KINETIC ISOTOPE EFFECTS

Gang Wu a, Jian-Ming Lü b, Wilfred A van der Donk c, Richard J Kulmacz a, Ah-lim Tsai a,*
PMCID: PMC3049311  NIHMSID: NIHMS262096  PMID: 21394223

Abstract

Cyclooxygenase catalysis by prostaglandin H synthase (PGHS) is thought to involve a multistep mechanism with several radical intermediates. The proposed mechanism begins with transfer of the C13 pro-(S) hydrogen atom from the substrate arachidonic acid (AA) to the Tyr385 radical in PGHS, followed by oxygen insertion and several bond rearrangements. The importance of the hydrogen-transfer step to controlling the overall kinetics of cyclooxygenase catalysis has not been directly examined. We quantified the non-competitive primary kinetic isotope effect (KIE) for both PGHS-1 and -2 using unlabeled AA and several deuterated AAs, including 13-pro-(S) d-AA, 13,13-d2-AA and 10, 10, 13,13-d4-AA. The primary KIE for steady-state cyclooxygenase catalysis, Dkcat, ranged between 1.8 and 2.3 in oxygen electrode measurements. The intrinsic KIE of AA radical formation by C13 pro-(S) hydrogen abstraction in PGHS-1 was estimated to be 1.9–2.3 using rapid freeze-quench EPR kinetic analysis of anaerobic reactions and computer modeling to a mechanism that includes slow formation of a pentadienyl AA radical and rapid equilibration of the AA radical with a tyrosyl radical, NS1c. The observation of similar values for steady-state and pre-steady state KIEs suggests that hydrogen abstraction is a rate-limiting step in cyclooxygenase catalysis. The large difference of the observed KIE from that of lipoxygenase indicates very different mechanism of hydrogen transfer.

1. INTRODUCTION

Prostaglandin H synthase (PGHS), both PGHS-1 and PGHS-2, exhibits two distinct, yet interrelated enzymatic activities: a peroxidase activity and a cyclooxygenase activity. The peroxidase activity generates a high-oxidation state intermediate, Intermediate I, which contains a ferryl heme and a proto-porphyrin radical; intra-molecular electron transfer from Tyr385 to the ferryl heme yields Intermediate II and a Tyr385 radical [13]. This tyrosyl radical initiates the cylcooxygenase cycle of PGHS, which converts arachidonic acid (AA) to the cyclooxygenase product, PGG2 [4, 5]. PGG2 is itself a peroxidase substrate, and can dissociate to activate another PGHS molecule in an auto-accelerative process that can produce a rapid burst of potent lipid signaling molecules [2].

Hamberg and Samuelsson proposed a cyclooxygenase reaction mechanism that starts with removal of the pro-(S) hydrogen at C13, as outlined in Scheme 1 [6, 7]. As noted above, the enzyme oxidant responsible for this hydrogen abstraction is now known to be the Tyr385 radical (Tyr371 in PGHS-2), and the initial lipid intermediate is a pentadienyl radical, with spin density distributed between C11–C15 (step A). Addition of O2 at C11 is thought to generate the first peroxyl radical intermediate (step B). The next step is formation of an endoperoxide between C11 and C9, which transfers the radical to C8 (step C). Subsequent cyclization between C8 and C12 forms a cyclopentane ring and delocalizes the radical over C13–C15 (step C), and reaction with a second O2 at C15 produces a PGG2 radical (step D). Finally, back transfer of a hydrogen from Tyr385 regenerates the Tyr385 radical and produces PGG2 (step F), which dissociates from the protein and leaves the enzyme ready to start the next cyclooxygenase cycle. Although this mechanism is supported by almost all the experimental evidence [4, 5], most of the mechanistic details remain untested. For example, resolved EPR signatures have been determined only for the Tyr385 radical in PGHS-1 (and Tyr 371 in PGHS-2) and AA pentadienyl radical intermediates in PGHS-2 [810]. The AA pentadienyl radical accumulates when PGHS-2 is reacted anaerobically with peroxide and AA, permitting the AA radical to be characterized by EPR [810]. In contrast, PGHS-1 reacted under similar conditions leads to accumulation of other radical species [11]; these include NS1c, which is a tyrosyl radical rather than an AA-based radical (Tsai et al., accompanying paper in this issue). These recent results suggested that an AA-based radical is an intermediate between the initial Tyr385 radical and NS1c in PGHS-1, but a direct test of this proposal was lacking.

Scheme 1. Mechanistic model for cyclooxygenase catalytic cycle based on the proposal by Hamberg and Samuelsson [7].

Scheme 1

“D” represents the deuterium substitution that produces the primary KIE. Two hydrogen abstraction steps could be sensitive to AA deuteration (marked by thick arrows): abstraction of C13 pro-(S) hydrogen by Tyr385· (step A) and abstraction of hydrogen from Tyr385 by the PGG2 radical (step F). The reversibility of individual reaction steps has not been confirmed and therefore is not shown. Tyr385 is assumed to be kinetically inactive in the O2 insertion steps (B and E) and the AA double bond rearrangement steps (C and D).

A major issue regarding the cyclooxygenase mechanism is the relative importance of the various steps in setting the overall catalytic rate. Few direct measurements have been made for individual steps in the mechanism in Scheme 1, and a rate constant has been evaluated only for the step involving formation of the Tyr385 radical [12, 13]. Hamberg and Samuelsson used an analysis of isotope enrichment in unreacted substrate after cyclooxygenase reaction with tritium-substituted 8, 11, 14-eicosatrienoic acid to conclude that the initial hydrogen abstraction from substrate (step A, Scheme 1) was rate limiting [7]. However, results from a recent study of competitive oxygen isotope effects in PGHS-1 cyclooxygenase catalysis appeared to identify the first kinetically irreversible step as formation of the endoperoxide ring or the bicyclic intermediate (steps C and D, Scheme 1); hydrogen abstraction from fatty acid appeared to be reversible [14].

The present study was designed to test whether an AA-based radical was indeed an intermediate in NS1c formation in PGHS-1 and to obtain an independent assessment of the kinetic importance and reversibility of the initial hydrogen abstraction step in cyclooxygenase catalysis. In contrast to the indirect, competitive method with a crude seminal vesicle homogenate used in the pioneering experiments [7], we used purified PGHS-1 and -2 to directly determine the primary deuterium KIE of cyclooxygenase catalysis by a non-competitive method with specific-deuterated substrates. Conversion of AA to PGG2 involves multiple steps, precluding direct determination of the intrinsic KIE of the C13 pro-(S) hydrogen abstraction step from overall cyclooxygenase reaction rates. To overcome this difficulty we used rapid-freeze quench EPR (RFQ-EPR) to analyze the kinetics of PGHS-1 reacting with peroxide and unlabeled or 13, 13-d2-AA under anaerobic conditions, which prevented proceeding beyond step A in Scheme 1. Although the kinetic events turned out to be more complicated than expected, we were able to estimate the intrinsic KIE of C13 pro-(S) hydrogen abstraction by fitting the experimental data to a mechanism with slow formation of AA radical and faster conversion of AA radical to the NS1c tyrosyl radical. The results of these KIE studies with steady-state and transient kinetic methods provide new mechanistic insights into the cyclooxygenase reaction.

2. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

2.1 Materials

Hemin was purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO) and Porphyrin Products (Logan, UT). EtOOH was either purchased from Polysciences Inc. (Warrington, PA) or kindly provided by Dr. G. Barney Ellison (University of Colorado, Boulder, CO); the EtOOH concentration was determined from the A230 using a molar absorptivity of 43 mM−1cm−1[15]. Tween 20 was from Anatrace (Maumee, OH). Arachidonic acid was purchased from Nu-Chek Prep, Inc. (Elysian, MN). The 13-pro-(S) d1-AA, 13, 13-d2-AA and 10, 10, 13, 13-d4-AA were synthesized in high stereochemical and isotopic purity as described earlier [1619].

PGHS-1 and -2 holoenzymes were prepared as previously published procedure as detailed in the accompany paper (Tsai et al., accompanying paper in this issue) [20]. The concentrations of PGHS-1 and -2 holoenzymes were calculated from their A410 using an extinction coefficient of 165 mM−1cm−1[21]. Cyclooxygenase activity was routinely assayed polarographically at 30 °C with a YSI Model 5331 electrode (with a standard membrane) and a YSI Model 53 monitor [22]. The reaction mixture contained 3.0 ml of 0.1 M KPi, pH 7.2 with 1.0 mM phenol and 0.05% Tween 20. PGHS-1 preparations had cyclooxygenase kcat values for AA consumption of 65–100 s−1 (assuming 2 mol O2/mol AA). Cyclooxygenase kcat values for the PGHS-2 preparations averaged ~ 15 s−1.

2.2 Non-competitive steady-state KIE measurement

The non-competitive steady-state KIE was calculated as the ratio of AA conversion rates (determined from O2 consumption) with unlabeled and deuterated AAs as substrate. Either standard or high sensitivity O2 electrode membranes were used. The temperature was controlled by an Isotemp 3016 water circulator (Fisher Scientific). Reactions were started by injection of enzyme; unless otherwise indicated, the enzyme concentration was 5 – 10 nM for PGHS-1 and 10 nM for PGHS-2. Working stocks of unlabeled and deuterated AAs were prepared by evaporating the organic solvent with a stream of N2 gas and resuspending the fatty acid in 0.1 M Tris, pH 8.5 buffer. The AA concentrations of the working stocks were determined from the extent of O2 consumption in reactions with excess PGHS-1, assuming 2 mol O2/mol AA. The values of kcat and KM were obtained by fitting rate vs. [substrate] data to the Michaelis-Menten equation:

v=kcat[PGHS][AA]/([AA]+KM). [Eq. I]

Primary KIE values were calculated as follows:

kDcat=kcat,H/kcat,D; [Eq. II]
KDM=KM,H/KM,D; [Eq. III]
(kcat/KM)D=(kcat/KM)H/(kcat/KM)D. [Eq. IV]

2.3 Measurement of deuterium oxide solvent isotope effect

PGHS-1 cyclooxygenase rates were determined at 30 °C in 0.1 M KPi buffer at different pH values prepared in H2O or in 90% D2O/10% H2O. The concentration of AA was 70 μM and a high sensitivity electrode membrane was used. The buffer pH was determined using a VWR Scientific model 8000 pH meter. The pD values of the 90% D2O buffers were calculated as [23]:

pD=pH+0.004×percentageofD2O. [Eq. V]

2.4 Determination of deuterium KIEs by RFQ-EPR pre-steady state kinetic measurements

An anaerobic mixture of PGHS-1 with AA or 13, 13-d2-AA was prepared by injecting a concentrated anaerobic solution of the fatty acid in EtOH into an anaerobic solution of PGHS-1 in 0.1M KPi, pH 7.2, containing 10% glycerol and 0.1% Tween 20. The final concentrations were 30 μM for PGHS-1, 150 μM for the fatty acid, and 6.2 % for EtOH. For the kinetic experiments, the PGHS-1/fatty acid mixture was reacted with an equal volume of buffer containing 150 μM EtOOH using an Update Instrument (Madison, WI) System 1000 chemical/freeze quench apparatus with a Model 1019 syringe ram and a Model 715 controller. The mixing apparatus was inside an anaerobic chamber (Coy Laboratory Products, Inc.) filled with 10% H2 in N2 and fitted with a palladium-based O2 scrubber. The ram velocity was 2 cm/s, the nozzle was 0.008 inch and the dead time was ~4 ms [24]. Single-push mixing was used for reactions < 160 ms; longer reactions used a push-push protocol. Reactions were conducted at room temperature (23 °C). RFQ-EPR procedures have been described previously [24].

After an EPR spectrum was acquired for each of the freeze-trapped kinetic samples, two approaches were used to analyze the changes in EPR spectrum with reaction time. In the first approach (spectral deconstruction), the NS1c component was resolved from the composite EPR spectrum by subtraction of residual WD1 signal. The fraction of residual WD1, f, was calculated by simultaneously satisfying two conditions over the relevant range of magnetic field:

(SexpScal)0 [Eq. VI]
Scal=fSWD1+(1f)SNS1c [Eq. VII]

Scal and Sexp are the calculated and observed EPR spectra, respectively; SWD1 and SNS1c are the EPR signals of pure WD1 and NS1c, respectively. In the second step, formation and decay rates for the NS1c radical signal were estimated by fitting the time course of the resolved NS1c spin concentration to the following equation:

I=I0kNS1c[exp(kNS1ct)exp(kdecayt)]/(kdecaykNS1c), [Eq. VIII]

where I and I0 are the observed and the maximum intensities of the NS1c radical signal; kNS1c and kdecay (with unit s−1) are the observed NS1c radical formation and decay rates, respectively.

The second approach to analyzing each set of RFQ-EPR spectra used global analysis with the Pro-K algorithm (Applied Photophysics, Leatherhead, UK) to resolve the EPR signals of individual intermediates in a specified input mechanism. Formation of the WD1 signal from Tyr385· was rapid and complete by 32 ms, with only one or two time points collected, so the kinetics of this step were not resolved. Further, no radical signal other than WD1 and NS1c accumulated to a noticeable level during these reactions. Accordingly, time points before 32 ms were excluded, and global analysis used a two step reaction model beginning with WD1:

WD1radicalkiNS1cradicalkiiEPRsilentspecies [Eq. IX]

The KIE for conversion of WD1 to NS1c, Dk, was calculated from the ratio of value of ki (obtained from global analysis) kNS1c (obtained from spectral deconstruction) with AA as substrate and the corresponding ki or kNS1c value with 13, 13-d2-AA as substrate.

2.5 EPR spectroscopy

EPR spectra were recorded at 110–120 K on a Bruker EMX spectrometer at ~ 9.2 gHz with modulation frequency = 100 kHz, modulation amplitude = 2 G, time constant = 327 ms and microwave power = 1 mW. Spin concentrations were determined by double integration of the EPR signals [11]. A packing factor of 0.45 was used for quantification of RFQ-EPR samples [24].

2.6 Computer modeling

The SCoP program (Simulation Resources Inc., Redlands, CA) was used to simulate the kinetics of tyrosyl and fatty acid radicals during anaerobic reaction of EtOOH with PGHS-1 pre-equilibrated with AA or 13, 13-d2-AA based on the model in Scheme 2 and the rate constants described below. Reaction 2 in Scheme 2 was considered to transfer spin to either Tyr348 (a good candidate due to its location near the C13 pro-(S) hydrogen of AA) or to Tyr385’, which is proposed to have a different phenyl ring orientation from that in Tyr385· giving the WD1 EPR signal (Tsai et al., accompanying paper in this issue). Hyperconjugation between the pz orbital of C1 and the two Cβ protons is presumed to be greater for Tyr385· than for Tyr385’; thus the tyrosyl radical has a more “relaxed” conformation in NS1c than in WD1. The level of AA used for pre-equilibration with PGHS-1 in the RFQ-EPR experiments (75 μM) was well above the KM for fatty acid, ensuring saturation of the PGHS active site. Accordingly, the AA binding process was not included in the simulation and every reaction step was treated as an intra-molecular, first-order hydrogen transfer (or proton-coupled electron transfer). The level of EtOOH used (150 μM) ensured that formation of Tyr385· was much faster than hydrogen abstraction from fatty acid and was not rate-limiting. Accordingly, formation of Tyr385· was omitted from the model.

Scheme 2. Proposed interconversions of radical intermediates during anaerobic reaction of PGHS with peroxide and AA.

Scheme 2

Left: the initial Tyr385 radical species (WD1) with bound AA (labeled or unlabeled). Center, top: pentadienyl AA radical species bound in active site with ground state Tyr348 and Tyr385 nearby; Tyr385 ring in relaxed conformation. Center, bottom: NS1c tyrosyl radical species involving Tyr348 or Tyr385 with relaxed conformation. Hydrogen transfers for k1 and k2 steps are indicated by thick arrows. The NS1c tyrosyl radical reacts with reductant to form EPR silent species in the k3 step. Addition of NO as a radical trapping agent, has been found to rapidly form an NO-AA adduct (Lü et al., accompanying paper in this issue).

Reactions using AA and 13, 13-d2-AA were distinguished in the simulation by different values of k1 (and of k2 when NS1c was generated). The value of k1 was 20 s−1 for AA and was varied between 1 and 10 s−1 for 13, 13-d2-AA. The value of k2 was varied between 50 and 1000 s−1. The experimentally determined value, 0.08 s−1, was used for k3. The k−2 value was set much smaller than that of k2 because the equilibrium between AA radical and NS1c appeared to strongly favor NS1c. As long as k2 was ≫ k1, and k−1 < k2, variation of k−1 between 0 and 5 s−1 did not affect the kinetic simulations (data not shown). Accordingly, the value of k−1 was subsequently set to zero. Quenching of the radical was assumed to be irreversible.

NS1c formation kinetics predicted by simulation were fitted to a single exponential function:

I=I0[1exp(kpredt)]. [Eq. X]

The predicted KIE value was calculated as the ratio of kpred values from simulations with AA and 13, 13-d2-AA as substrate. The theoretical intrinsic KIE of the hydrogen abstraction step in the simulations (i.e., hydrogen abstraction from AA by Tyr385·) was the ratio of the k1 values used for AA and 13, 13-d2-AA.

3. RESULTS

3.1 Non-competitive, steady-state KIE for PGHS cyclooxygenase catalysis

Cyclooxygenase kcat and KM values were calculated from the substrate dependence curves of PGHS-1 and -2 in steady state reactions with AA, 13-pro-(S) d-AA, 13, 13-d2-AA or 10, 10, 13, 13-d4-AA at 20 °C and pH 7.2. Simple, saturable kinetics were observed in each case. A typical steady-state Michaelis-Menten plot, for PGHS-2 with AA and 13, 13-d2-AA, is presented in Fig. 1; Table 1 shows the kcat and KM values determined in the steady-state reactions and the KIEs calculated from them. The Dkcat value for PGHS-1 ranged from 1.8 to 2.3 with the three deuterated substrates. PGHS-2 was examined with only 10, 10, 13, 13-d4-AA and exhibited a Dkcat value of 1.6. DKM values ranged from 0.8 to 1.5 (Table 1), suggesting that each enzyme had roughly comparable affinities for unlabeled and deuterated AAs.

Figure 1. Substrate dependence of PGHS-2 cyclooxygenase activity with AA (circles) and 13, 13-d2-AA (diamonds).

Figure 1

The cyclooxygenase rates were measured at 20 °C and pH 7.2. The lines represent the fits to the Michaelis-Menten equation. This substrate dependence of activity is one out of three complete experiments which yielded similar results.

Table 1.

PGHS-1 and -2 cyclooxygenase kinetic parameters and non-competitive KIEs for reaction at 20 °C and pH 7.2.1

PGHS kcat, s−1 KM, μM kcat, s−1 KM, μM Deuterium Kinetic Isotope Effect
Dkcat DKM D(kcat/KM)
AA 13 pro-(S) d1-AA
PGHS-1* 44.6 ± 0.8 5.4 ± 0.4 24 ± 1 3.5 ± 0.8 1.8 ± 0.2 1.5 ± 0.5 1.2 ± 0.5
AA 13, 13-d2-AA
PGHS-1 20.8 ± 0.7 6.4 ± 0.8 8.9 ± 0.3 4.6 ± 0.7 2.3 ± 0.2 1.4 ± 0.4 1.6 ± 0.6
PGHS-2 9.2 ± 0.4 2.3 ± 0.3 5.6 ± 0.1 2.8 ± 0.4 1.6 ± 0.1 0.8 ± 0.2 2.0 ± 0.6
AA 10, 10, 13, 13-d4-AA
PGHS-1 57 ± 1 6 ± 1 31 ± 1 5.0 ± 0.9 1.8 ± 0.3 1.3 ± 0.5 1.4 ± 0.8
1

Values indicate the mean ± average deviation from the mean obtained from two (*) or four experiments. Data in the same row were generated from the same batch of enzyme and batch to batch activity variation was noticed.

KIEs for 13 pro-(S) d1-AA and 10, 10, 13 13-d4-AA were measured using a high sensitivity electrode membrane; those for 13, 13-d2-AA were measured using a standard sensitivity membrane.

The KIE of kcat varied little over the pH range of 6.2 to 8.2 (Table S1 in Supporting Information) and little solvent KIE was observed in the same pH range (Fig. S1 in Supporting Information). It should be noted, however, that both PGHS-1 and PGHS-2 exhibited larger KIE values at 30 °C (Table S1) than at 20 °C (Table 1). KIEs are generally expected to increase with decreasing temperature [25], and the basis for the unusual temperature dependence of the PGHS-1 and -2 KIEs is being investigated further.

3.2 PGHS-1 deuterium KIE from RFQ-EPR kinetics

Measurements of Tyr385· formation kinetics were made by reacting PGHS-1 anaerobically with EtOOH in control RFQ-EPR experiments (Fig. 2A). A 34 G WD1 EPR signal formed within 10 ms, similar to previous observations under aerobic conditions [26]. The line-shape gradually converted to a 32 G wide singlet (WS1) by ~5 s. When EtOOH was reacted anaerobically with PGHS-1 pre-equilibrated with AA or 13, 13-d2-AA, the WD1 EPR signal intensity was maximal at the first time point (10 ms) and decayed subsequently (Figs. 2B and 2C). The WD1 was replaced by a 24 – 25 G narrow singlet without displaying the wide singlet feature (WS1) observed in the absence of fatty acid. The lineshape of this narrow singlet was essentially the same as the NS1c tyrosyl radical (Tsai et al., accompanying paper in this issue).

Figure 2. RFQ-EPR spectral changes during anaerobic reactions of EtOOH with PGHS-1 alone (panel A), PGHS-1 pre-equilibrated with AA (panel B) or PGHS-1 pre-equilibrated with 13, 13-d2-AA (Panel C).

Figure 2

The RFQ reactions used 30 μM PGHS-1, 150 μM fatty acid and 150 μM EtOOH. The reaction time is indicated on each spectrum. The vertical dashed lines indicate the positions of the peak and trough of the earliest WD1 spectrum, providing a visual guide for later changes in linewidth. Two additional repetitions of such RFQ-EPR kinetic measurements gave similar outcome.

In the control reactions without fatty acid the total radical intensity (WD1 + WS1) increased at a rate of ~55 s−1 to reach a maximum of ~0.3 spin/heme at 100 ms, changed little for several seconds, and then decayed slowly at a rate ~ 0.01 s−1 (Fig. 3). To examine the radical kinetics for reactions of EtOOH with PGHS-1 pre-equilibrated with fatty acid, the EPR spectra in panels B and C of Fig. 2 were resolved into WD1 and NS1c components using the spectral deconstruction approach (Experimental Procedures). The intensities of the resulting WD1 and NS1c components are shown as a function of reaction time in Fig. 3. WD1 intensity was maximal at the first time point for reactions with unlabeled and deuterated AAs, and subsequently decayed at 25 s−1 for AA and more slowly (18 s−1) for reactions with 13, 13-d2-AA. NS1c signal intensities increased at a slight slower rate than found for decay of WD1 intensities (Fig. 3). The rate constants for NS1c formation were 14 ± 3 s−1 (n = 3) for reactions with AA and 7 ± 3 s−1 (n = 3) for reactions with 13, 13-d2-AA, giving a KIE value for NS1c formation of 2.0 ± 1.3 (n = 3). The intensity of the NS1c radical decayed slowly (~0.08 s−1) for reactions with unlabeled or deuterated AA (Fig. 3).

Figure 3. Effects of AA deuteration on the kinetics of WD1 and NS1c radical species during anaerobic reaction of PGHS-1 with fatty acid and peroxide.

Figure 3

Analysis of the EPR spectra in Fig. 2 by spectral resolution was used to evaluate the concentrations of WD1 (open symbols) and NS1c (filled symbols) during reactions of EtOOH with PGHS-1 pre-equilibrated with AA (circles) or 13, 13-d2-AA (squares). Solid lines are the fits to [Eq. VIII] for each resolved radical species. The kinetic data of tyrosyl radical (diamonds) and its fit to [Eq. VIII] (dashed line) in the control reaction of PGHS-1 with EtOOH are also shown. Similar outcome of the WD1 and NS1c kinetics were also obtained from other two complete sets of experiments.

The RFQ-EPR spectra in panels B and C of Fig. 2 were separately resolved into WD1 and NS1c components by global analysis based on the model in Eq. IX (Experimental Procedures) (Fig. 4). The resulting rate constants for NS1c radical formation were 16 ± 8 s−1 with AA as substrate, and 10 ± 4 s−1 with 13, 13-d2-AA as substrate. The KIE value calculated from these rate constants was 2 ± 1.

Figure 4. EPR signatures of radical intermediates resolved by global analysis.

Figure 4

The sets of RFQ-EPR spectra obtained during anaerobic reaction of EtOOH (150 μM) with PGHS-1 (30 μM) pre-equilibrated with 150 μM AA or 13, 13-d2-AA (panels B and C of Fig. 2) were analyzed by global analysis using a two-step model (Eq. IX). The resulting resolved EPR spectra for WD1 (solid lines) and NS1c (dashed lines) are shown for reactions with AA (panel A) and with 13, 13-d2-AA (panel B). Details are described in Experimental Procedures. Essentially identical resolved component spectra were also obtained from other two sets of experiments.

Global analysis of the RFQ-EPR spectra in Fig. 2 was also performed with a three-step model with an AA radical intermediate between WD1 and NS1c (data not shown). This analysis attributed very little intensity to the AA radical, and the corresponding resolved EPR spectrum was much narrower than the EPR of an authentic pentadienyl radical. Thus, global analysis indicated that little if any AA pentadienyl radical signal is present in the RFQ-EPR spectra in Fig. 2, corroborating the results from spectral deconstruction.

3.3 Computer modeling to estimate intrinsic KIE values for the hydrogen transfer step(s)

Computer simulation of radical kinetics provides a way to estimate the intrinsic KIE for the H-transfer step (A in Scheme 1) based on the NS1c formation kinetics determined by RFQ EPR measurements. As depicted in Scheme 2, the radical interconversions occurring during anaerobic reaction of EtOOH with AA and PGHS can be described by a simple three-step model:

Y385·+AAk1Y385+AA·k2AA+NS1ck3EPRsilentspecies [Eq. XI]

This model is essentially an expansion of that used for global analysis of the RFQ-EPR data (Eq. IX) to explicitly include the hydrogen transfer step that forms the pentadienyl AA radical (AA ). Predictions of reaction time courses expected for the mechanism in Eq. XI were obtained by simulations with SCoP using the parameter set mentioned in Experimental Procedures. We first assessed the sensitivity of the pentadienyl AA radical kinetics to the value of k2, fixing k1 and k3 close to the observed values for NS1c formation and decay, respectively. The proportion of pentadienyl AA radical accumulation was predicted to be very sensitive to the value of k2 (Fig. 5). When k2 was set at 50 s−1, 2.5 times the value of k1, AA radical accumulation was predicted to peak at ~20% of the initial concentration of WD1 (Fig. 5A). When k2 was set at 200 s−1, accumulation of AA radical decreased to less than 10% of the initial level of WD1 (Fig. 5B). Increasing k2 to 500 s−1 further decreased the predicted peak level of AA radical (Fig. 5C). As noted above, a pentadienyl radical component was not resolved from the RFQ-EPR data by either spectral deconstruction or global analysis. In practice, an AA pentadienyl radical accounting for 10% or less of total spin would be very difficult to resolve from the WD1 and NS1c radical signals. All of this strongly suggests that a rate constant for hydrogen transfer to AA radical (k2) of ≥ 200 s−1 is quite reasonable, and indeed the kinetic data for WD1 and NS1c determined by RFQ-EPR were well simulated with k2 ≥ 200 s−1 (Fig. 5B).

Figure 5. Computer simulated kinetics of radicals in the anaerobic reactions of EtOOH with PGHS-1 pre-equilibrated with AA.

Figure 5

Simulations are shown in solid line for WD1, dash-dot-dot line for AA pentadienyl radical, and dash line for NS1c. Rate constants used in the simulations: k1, 20 s−1; k−1, 0 s−1; k2 50 s−1 (panel A), 200 s−1 (panel B) or 500 s−1 (panel C); k−2, 1 s−1; and k3, 0.08 s−1. The comparison of WD1 and NS1c kinetics from RFQ-EPR of EtOOH reacted with PGHS-1 pre-equilibrated with AA (from Fig. 4) with the simulated kinetics of tyrosyl radicals is shown in Panel B. Solid circles, WD1 radical; solid triangles, NS1c radical.

The observed KIE, Dk, in RFQ-EPR presumably reflects a combination of k1, k−1, k2, k−2 and k3, with k1 and k2 as dominant parameters. The hydrogen atom transferred between AA/AA and Tyr385/Tyr385 in step 1 is replaced by deuterium in the labeled substrate, so both forward and reverse kinetics of this step should be slower with the deuterated AA. Two scenarios can be envisioned for step 2. If NS1c is on Tyr385’, formation of the NS1c radical (step 2) will involve transfer of the hydrogen/deuterium atom originally removed from C13 of AA in step 1, and thus step 2 kinetics also should be slowed with the labeled substrate. On the other hand, if the NS1c tyrosyl radical forms on a residue other than Tyr385 (e.g., Tyr348), only protium transfers would be involved in step 2 and the kinetics of this step would be insensitive to AA deuteration.

Simulations were first performed for the case where AA deuteration affects only the kinetics of step 1. For each specific k2 value, the generated kinetic trace for NS1c formation could be fitted to Eq. X to get a predicted rate, kpred. When k2 was 200 s−1 or faster, the predicted KIE, calculated as the ratio of the kpred using AA or to that with 13, 13-d2-AA as substrate, (kpred, AA/kpred, d2-AA), leveled off at 1.85, about 7.5% lower than the preset intrinsic KIE (k1, AA/k1, d2-AA), 2.0 (Fig. 6A). The simulation also predicted that when k2 ≫ k1, the predicted KIE was directly proportional to the preset intrinsic KIE (Fig. 6B). This linear relationship indicates that the ratio of NS1c formation rates with AA and 13, 13-d2-AA approximate the actual intrinsic KIE for hydrogen abstraction from AA. Combining the results from RFQ-EPR analysis and computer modeling, we estimate the intrinsic KIE of C13 pro-(S) hydrogen abstraction from AA by Tyr385· to be 2.3 (spectral synthesis method) or 1.9 (global analysis).

Figure 6. KIE predicted from simulated kinetic data.

Figure 6

Panel A: dependence of the predicted KIE (= kpred, AA/kpred, d2-AA) on value of k2, with k1 = 20 s−1 (for AA) or 10 s−1 (for d2-AA). Solid circles: k2 = 20 – 1000 s−1 for both AA and d2-AA; open circles: k2 = 20 – 1000 s−1 for AA and k2, AA/k2, d2-AA = 2. The value of preset intrinsic KIE, k1, AA/k1, d2-AA = 2, is marked with the dashed line. Panel B: correlation between predicted KIE, kpred, AA/kpred, d2-AA, and preset intrinsic KIE, k1, AA/k1, d2-AA, with k1= 20 s−1 (AA) or 1 – 20 s−1 (d2-AA). Solid circles: k2 = 200 s−1 for both AA and d2-AA; open circles: k2, 20 – 1000 s−1 for AA and k2, AA/k2, d2-AA = k1, AA/k1, d2-AA. For all the simulations, k3 = 0.08 s−1; k−2 = 1 s−1; k−1, 0 s−1.

For simulations of the case where the kinetics of both step 1 and 2 are affected by AA deuteration, we set the intrinsic KIE of step 1 equal to that of step 2. The predicted KIE values in this case were almost independent of the k2 value chosen, and ranged between 1.88 and 1.91, slightly lower than the preset KIE value of 2.0 (Fig. 6A). The predicted KIEs for NS1c formation exhibited an approximately linear relationship with the set intrinsic KIE, when the latter was lower than 6 and k2 ≥ k1 (Fig. 6B). When the preset intrinsic KIE value was > 6, the predicted KIE for NS1c formation rose sharply (Fig. 6B), suggesting that the overall KIE can be significantly larger than the intrinsic KIE of either step when both steps are isotope sensitive. However, the overall KIE values observed in the RFQ-EPR experiments were ~2, well below the predicted threshold for non-linear behavior (Fig. 6B). Thus, the simulation results suggest that the KIE for formation of NS1c is a good approximation of the intrinsic KIE for hydrogen transfer from AA to Tyr385· when the first two steps in the mechanism are both isotope sensitive.

4. DISCUSSION

The results from the present non-competitive, steady-state measurements show that PGHS-1 and -2 have primary deuterium KIEs in the range of 1.7 – 2.3 for cyclooxygenase catalysis. The current data do not permit calculation of a secondary KIE for pro-(R) deuterium substitution at C13. The observed primary deuterium Dkcat values are considerably smaller than the theoretical maximum of 7–8 [27], which could be due to other steps masking a larger intrinsic isotope effect. The small D(kcat/KM) values may result from the dissociation of the PGHS(AA) reaction complex being significantly slower than AA conversion to PGG2. One aspect that may affect the cyclooxygenase isotope effect is reversibility of pro-(S) hydrogen abstraction from C13 of AA (step A in Scheme 1). Such reversibility was inferred from the observation of a competitive 18O KIE, which indicates that O2 addition occurs in or before the first kinetically irreversible step [14]. Based on the magnitude of the measured competitive 18O KIE, the first kinetically irreversible step was proposed to be either endoperoxide formation or formation of the bicyclic intermediate (Scheme 1, steps C and D, respectively) [14]. On the other hand, the calculated free energy surface for PGG2 formation suggested that two other steps have considerable activation energies: 14.5 kcal/mol for C13 pro-(S) hydrogen abstraction and 14.9 kcal/mol for cyclopentane ring closure [28]. Both of these steps were expected to be irreversible due to the large activation energy barriers for the reverse reactions, 23.7 and 23.6 kcal/mol, respectively [28].

To evaluate whether the small primary deuterium KIEs measured for steady state turnover reflect the intrinsic KIE of the hydrogen abstraction step, we attempted to directly measure the kinetics of AA radical formation in PGHS-1 with AA and C13 pro-(S) deuterated AA as substrate. Based on the current mechanism (Scheme 1), we expected to isolate the C13 pro-(S) hydrogen abstraction step from subsequent steps under anaerobic conditions. However, we found that the AA radical did not accumulate even in the absence of O2 but was converted rapidly to another tyrosyl radical, NS1c (Fig. 2) (Tsai et al., accompanying paper in this issue) and no experimental evidence suggested that this conversion was a multi-step process. Although the AA pentadienyl radical EPR signal was not evident in the RFQ-EPR data, the involvement of a transient AA radical intermediate was demonstrated by the faster formation of NS1c with AA than with 13,13-d2-AA (Fig. 3). Direct conversion of WD1 to NS1c should not produce a deuterium KIE. Furthermore, an AA pentadienyl radical intermediate itself was observed when PGHS-1 was reacted with a mixture of AA and EtOOH, rather than being pre-equilibrated with AA before reaction with EtOOH (Tsai et al., accompanying paper in this issue). Additional indication of an AA radical intermediate between WD1 and NS1c comes from the observation that WD1 decay was faster than NS1c formation for both AA and 13, 13-d2-AA substrates (Fig. 3). Further support for the AA radical as a precursor to NS1c (as depicted in Scheme 2) is the observed formation of an oxime adduct at C11 of AA when NO was used as a radical trapping agent under conditions that generate NS1c (Lü et al., accompanying paper in this issue). Our interpretation is that NO trapped an AA radical that is in equilibrium with NS1c (Scheme 2). O2 may similarly drive cyclooxygenase reactions downstream from the initially formed AA radical to form PGG2 (Scheme 1).

The projected hydrogen transfer from tyrosine to AA pentadienyl radical to form NS1c (Scheme 2) would seem to be thermodynamically uphill given the redox potentials for model pentadienyl and tyrosyl radical species (~0.6 and ~0.9 V, respectively [29, 30]. However, these midpoint potentials may be significantly shifted when the radical intermediates are in the PGHS active site environment. For example, a slight steric constraint exerted by the protein could easily convert the pentadienyl radical to an allyl radical, whose redox potential can be above 0.9 V [29]. Similarly, the redox potential of the NS1c tyrosyl radical could be lowered if the radical is stabilized by local H-bonding and polarity changes. A drop of just 100 mV for the latter half reaction would make the thermodynamics favorable for NS1c formation. Lysine 2,3-amino mutase provides an example of redox potential modulation by the protein environment [31]. In this case, the reversible, hemolytic cleavage of S-adenosyl methionine (SAM) involves electron transfer from the [4Fe-4S] iron-sulfur center to the sulfonium group of SAM, theoretically an uphill process. However, binding of substrate lysine was found to decrease the midpoint potential of the [4Fe-4S] center by 0.17 V and the equilibrium constant of the reaction indicates that binding to the iron-sulfur cluster increases SAM’s redox potential by 0.73 V.

The absence of AA radical accumulation in our RFQ-EPR experiments provided a constraint on the k2/k1 ratio in our computer modeling (Fig. 5), and suggests that the NS1c formation rate is approximately an order of magnitude faster than the initial hydrogen transfer from AA to Tyr385· (Fig. 6A). Simulations with a k2/k1 ratio of 10 predicted a KIE for NS1c formation that was slightly lower than the preset intrinsic KIE of the first hydrogen abstraction (Fig. 6A). In other words, the KIE value experimentally determined for NS1c radical formation approximates the intrinsic KIE value for the hydrogen transfer step. Analysis of the RFQ-EPR kinetic data by two separate approaches resulted in KIE values between 1.9 and 2.3. Thus, the KIE value for hydrogen abstraction from AA by Tyr385· is likely to be ~2. The similarity between the estimated hydrogen abstraction KIE value and the Dkcat values determined by steady-state kinetics indicates that the non-competitive Dkcat is not suppressed noticeably by the kinetic complexity of the cyclooxygenase reaction and that a hydrogen abstraction step is partially rate-limiting in cyclooxygenase catalysis, along with the first O2 insertion and bi-cyclic ring formation. Rate limitation at the hydrogen abstraction step is also consistent with the earlier observation of accumulation of the WD1 tyrosyl radical when AA was mixed with PGHS-1 in the presence of excess oxygen [32].

The minimal observed effect of pH on the KIE of kcat and the lack of solvent deuterium KIE in the steady-state kinetic measurements (Table S1 and Fig. S1) indicate that there is no additional chemical step involving the participation of a pH-sensitive amino acid side chain or the proton exchange with the solvent in our observed KIE. Thus our proposed mechanism in Scheme 2 including two chemical steps: WD1 → AA pentadienyl radical → NS1c provides a minimal model to account for both steady-state and pre-steady state kinetic data.

The modest deuterium KIEs of ~2 observed with PGHS-1 and -2 are in sharp contrast to the extremely large KIEs observed with plant lipoxygenases (LOX), e.g., 65 for linoleic acid [3337] and 97 for AA [38]. These non-heme iron enzymes also catalyze fatty acid dioxygenation, and the LOX mechanism also appears to involve generation of a substrate radical before oxygen incorporation [3941]. In the LOX mechanism, peroxide reacts with the ferrous form of the enzyme, generating a ferric intermediate that abstracts hydrogen from the fatty acid substrate to generate a substrate radical and Fe(II)-OH2. Addition of O2 to the fatty acid radical leads to a peroxyl radical, which reacts with Fe(II)-OH2 to form hydroperoxy fatty acid and regenerates Fe(III)-OH to start another catalytic cycle. Many studies have found that hydrogen transfer from fatty acid substrate is the overall rate-determining step for LOX catalysis [3337]. The large KIEs observed for LOX have been attributed to quantum hydrogen tunneling [3337]. The striking difference between LOX and PGHS-1 and -2 in the KIE for hydrogen abstraction indicates that the structures of the transition complexes ([Fe(III)-OH --- H --- AA] for LOX and [Tyr385 --- H --- AA] for PGHS) are very different.

Intrinsic deuterium KIEs significantly less than the theoretical maximum of 7 – 8 predicted by absolute rate theory [27] have been reported for various reactions [4244]. Kinetic isotope effect of a reaction reaches the classical limit only for symmetrical transition state, but becomes smaller when it resembles more like either the product or the reactant. The very small cyclooxygenase KIE indicates that the structure of the activation complex in PGHS-1 or PGHS-2, [Tyr385· --- H --- AA], is very asymmetric, biased towards either reactants or products. The calculated free energy surface of this step suggests the bias is probably towards the reactant side [28].

In summary, our steady-state and pre-steady state deuterium KIE studies provide strong evidence for the rate-limiting nature of the first hydrogen transfer step of cyclooxygenase catalysis. Our strategy in binding AA to the PGHS before reaction with EtOOH anaerobically by RFQ/EPR constrained our rate determination in only two chemical steps, including first a H-transfer between AA and Tyr and a second rapid equilibrium between AA and the tyrosine that forms NS1c. The latter fast radical equilibrium was concluded from the studies of the other two accompanying papers. Computer modeling based on the minimal mechanism with these two chemical steps enabled determination of the intrinsic rate of the H-transfer. Such powerful and innovative approach is new in the literature and could find useful application in resolving intrinsic rate and the associated KIE for other enzyme systems. The observation that the cyclooxygenase KIE is more than an order of magnitude less than that for non-heme iron lipoxygenases indicates that the two types of fatty acid oxygenase have very different underlying mechanisms for the H-transfer step.

Supplementary Material

01

Acknowledgments

Supported by NIH GM44911 (A.-L.T), and GM52170 (R.J.K).

5. ABBREVIATIONS

PGHS-1 and -2

prostaglandin H synthase isoforms 1 and 2

PGG2

prostaglandin G2

AA

arachidonic acid

13-pro-(S) d-AA, 13

13-d2-AA, and 10, 10, 13,13-d4-AA, arachidonic acid with deuterium substitution on C13 and/or C10

EtOOH

ethyl hydrogen peroxide

KIE

kinetic isotope effect

EPR

electron paramagnetic resonance spectrometry

WD1

wide doublet tyrosyl radical EPR signal in PGHS-1

NS1c

narrow singlet tyrosyl radical EPR signal in PGHS-1 reacted anaerobically with EtOOH and AA

RFQ

rapid freeze quench

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Shimokawa T, Kulmacz RJ, Dewitt DL, Smith WL. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:20073–20076. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tsai AL, Kulmacz RJ. Prostagl Other Lipid Mediat. 2000;62:231–254. doi: 10.1016/s0090-6980(00)00083-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kiefer JR, Pawlitz JL, Moreland KT, Stegeman RA, Hood WF, Gierse JK, Stevens AM, Goodwin DC, Rowlinson SW, Marnett LJ, Stallings WC, Kurumbail RG. Nature. 2000;405:97–101. doi: 10.1038/35011103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rouzer CA, Marnett LJ. Chem Rev. 2003;103:2239–2304. doi: 10.1021/cr000068x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tsai AL, Kulmacz RJ. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2009;493:103–124. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2009.08.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.van der Donk WA, Tsai AL, Kulmacz RJ. Biochemistry. 2002;41:15451–15458. doi: 10.1021/bi026938h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hamberg M, Samuelsson B. J Biol Chem. 1967;242:5336–5343. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Peng S, Okeley NM, Tsai AL, Wu G, Kulmacz RJ, van der Donk WA. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:10785–10796. doi: 10.1021/ja026880u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tsai AL, Hsi LC, Kulmacz RJ, Palmer G, Smith WL. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:5085–5091. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tsai AL, Palmer G, Xiao G, Swinney DC, Kulmacz RJ. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:3888–3894. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.7.3888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tsai AL, Kulmacz RJ, Palmer G. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:10503–10508. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.18.10503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Karthein R, Dietz R, Nastainczyk W, Ruf HH. Eur J Biochem. 1988;171:313–320. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1988.tb13792.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tsai AL, Wu G, Palmer G, Bambai B, Koehn JA, Marshall PJ, Kulmacz RJ. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:21695–21700. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.31.21695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mukherjee A, Brinkley DW, Chang KM, Roth JP. Biochemistry. 2007;46:3975–3989. doi: 10.1021/bi602502j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Brill AS, Williams RJ. Biochem J. 1961;78:253–262. doi: 10.1042/bj0780253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Peng S, Okeley NM, Tsai AL, Wu G, Kulmacz RJ, van der Donk WA. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:3609–3610. doi: 10.1021/ja015599x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Peng S, Okeley NM, Tsai AL, Wu G, Kulmacz RJ, van der Donk WA. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:10785–10796. doi: 10.1021/ja026880u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jacquot C, Wecksler AT, McGinley CM, Segraves EN, Holman TR, van der Donk WA. Biochemistry. 2008;47:7295–7303. doi: 10.1021/bi800308q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Peng S, McGinley CM, van der Donk WA. Org Lett. 2004;6:349–352. doi: 10.1021/ol0361711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kulmacz RJ, Tsai AL, Palmer G. J Biol Chem. 1987;262:10524–10531. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kulmacz RJ, Palmer G, Tsai AL. Mol Pharmacol. 1991;40:833–837. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kulmacz RJ, Lands WEM. In: Prostaglandins and Related Substances: A Practical Approach. Benedetto C, McDonald-Gibson RG, Nigam S, Slater TF, editors. IRL Press; Washington, DC: 1987. pp. 209–227. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Colen AH, Wilkinson RR, Fisher HF. J Biol Chem. 1975;250:5243–5246. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tsai AL, Berka V, Kulmacz RJ, Wu G, Palmer G. Anal Biochem. 1998;264:165–171. doi: 10.1006/abio.1998.2774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Klinman JP. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006;361:1323–1331. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2006.1870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tsai A, Wu G, Palmer G, Bambai B, Koehn JA, Marshall PJ, Kulmacz RJ. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:21695–21700. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.31.21695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kresge AJ. In: Isotope effects on enzyme-catalyzed reactions. Cleland WW, O’Leary MH, Northrop DB, editors. University Park Press; Baltimore: 1977. pp. 37–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Blomberg LM, Blomberg MRA, Siegbahn PEM, van der Donk WA, Tsai AL. J Phys Chem B. 2003;107:3297–3308. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.DeFelippis MR, Murthy CP, Faraggi M, Klapper MH. Biochemistry. 1989;28:4847–4853. doi: 10.1021/bi00437a049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Koppenol WH. FEBS Lett. 1990;264:165–167. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(90)80239-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Frey PA, Hegeman AD, Reed GH. Chem Rev. 2006;106:3302–3316. doi: 10.1021/cr050292s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tsai AL, Palmer G, Kulmacz RJ. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:17753–17759. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Glickman MH, Klinman JP. Biochemistry. 1995;34:14077–14092. doi: 10.1021/bi00043a013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Glickman MH, Klinman JP. Biochemistry. 1996;35:12882–12892. doi: 10.1021/bi960985q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jonsson T, Glickman MH, Sun SJ, Klinman JP. J Am Chem Soc. 1996;118:10319–10320. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Glickman MH, Wiseman JS, Klinman JP. J Am Chem Soc. 1994;116:793–794. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hwang CC, Grissom CB. J Ame Chem Soc. 1994;116:795–796. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Peng S, van der Donk WA. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:8988–8989. doi: 10.1021/ja035977t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Andreou A, Feussner I. Phytochemistry. 2009;70:1504–1510. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2009.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hamberg M, Samuelsson B. J Biol Chem. 1967;242:5329–5335. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rickert KW, Klinman JP. Biochemistry. 1999;38:12218–12228. doi: 10.1021/bi990834y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Denu JM, Fitzpatrick PF. Biochemistry. 1994;33:4001–4007. doi: 10.1021/bi00179a029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Balasubramanian B, Pogozelski WK, Tullius TD. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:9738–9743. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.17.9738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Baciocchi E, Lanzalunga O, Manduchi L. Chem Commun. 1999 [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01

RESOURCES