Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan 25;104(4):685–692. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6606067

Table 5. Timeliness of abnormal (‘>BMD’ or ‘BMD’) and normal smear preceding cervical cancer. All smear types (smear and work-up smears).

Cytology Total, n (%) Not delayed, n (%) 95% CI
>BMDa 142 (100) 88 (62.0) 53.5–70.0
BMDb 46 (100) 26 (56.5) 41.1–71.1
Total 188c (100) 114 (60.6) 53.3–67.7

Abbreviations: BMD=borderline/mild dyskaryosis; CI=confidence interval.

a

Maximum time interval between the first abnormal smear and histologically confirmed CxCa was 6 months (a longer time interval was considered as delay in the diagnosis).

b

Maximum time interval between the first abnormal smear and histologically confirmed CxCa was 24 months (a longer time interval was considered as delay in the diagnosis).

c

In total, 73 out of 286 women had no smear at all preceding the diagnosis, thus leaving 213 cases with a smear. A total of 25 out of these 213 women had only normal cytology (n=23) or information on time was lacking (n=2), leaving 188 cases to analyse. This group consisted of >BMD or BMD as follows: in the screen period 15 and 21 women had >BMD and BMD, respectively (Table 3). In the work-up period group, 75 and 11 women had >BMD and BMD, respectively. Furthermore, 41 and 9 women who had a normal smear result in the screen period had >BMD and BMD, respectively, as work-up smear. Finally, for women who had a normal smear result in the underscreened period (n=12), 10 women had >BMD as work-up smear (The remaining two woman had normal smear result again). Another one and five women had already >BMD and BMD, respectively, in the underscreened period (Table 3). This results in a total of 142 >BMD and 46 BMD women (total n=188).