Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 8.
Published in final edited form as: Patient. 2010;3(4):229–248. doi: 10.2165/11539470-000000000-00000

Table IV.

Multi-criteria analysis using the ordinal MAGIQ method.

Effectiveness Risk of Adverse Effects. Cost
Priority #1,
weight 0.61
Priority #2,
weight 0.28
Priority #3,
weight 0.15
Symptom
relief
Halt disease
progression
Serious Common
Intra-criterion
priority
#2, weight
0.25
#1, weight
0.75
# 1, weight
0.75
#2, weight
0.25
Global
decision
priority
0.61 × 0.25 =
0.15
0.61 × 0.75
= 0.46
0.28 × 0.75 =
0.21
0.28 × 0.25 =
0.07
0.15 × 1 =
0.15
Summary Scores a
Alternative ranks and scores Raw Normalized
Drug A #1 - 0.61 #3 – 0.15 #1 – 0.61 #1 – 0.61 #1 – 0.61 0.42 0.39
Drug B1 #2 - 0.22 #2 – 0.28 #2 – 0.28 #2 – 0.28 #2 – 0.28 0.29 0.27
Drug C #3 - 0.15 #1 – 0.61 #3 – 0.15 #3 – 0.15 #3 – 0.15 0.37 0.34
a

Summary score calculated by multiplying alternative scores for each criterion times the criterion priorities and then normalizing by dividing each score the sum of scores. For example, the raw summary score of Drug A = (0.15 × 0.61) + (0.46 × 0.15) + (0.21 × 0.61) + ( 0.07 × 0.61) + (0.15 × 0.61); the normalized score = 0.42 / (0.42 + 0.29 + 0.37).