Table 3.
Indices of MUSCLE STRENGTH measured before and after bed rest in controls and LMMS. Baseline and day 90 values are presented in foot-pounds. LMMS did not show a significant “benefit” on preserving muscle extension in concentric or eccentric motion; however there was a significant retention during flexion in multiple concentric measures. Percent difference from baseline for both control and LMMS, as well as the “benefit” of LMMS (inferred from relative LMMS retention of baseline measures as compared to control) at that time point, are also provided.
Control Baseline | LMMS Baseline | Control 90d | LMMS 90d | Benefit of LMMS | p | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Knee Concentric Strength | ||||||
Extension at 60°/sec | 109 ± 43 | 120 ± 31 | 81 ± 39 | 90 ± 24 | +2.7% | 0.33 |
Extension at 180°/sec | 80 ± 33 | 88 ± 28 | 63 ± 28 | 70 ± 23 | +3.7% | 0.48 |
Flexion at 60°/sec | 64 ± 25 | 63 ± 17 | 51 ± 19 | 53 ± 14 | +21.9% | 0.13 |
Flexion at 180°/sec | 48 ± 19 | 51 ± 15 | 41 ± 16 | 47 ± 13 | +46.2% | 0.01 |
Knee Concentric Endurance | ||||||
Extension at 180°/sec | 1158 ± 511 | 1028 ± 339 | 945 ± 442 | 881 ± 296 | +22.3% | 0.17 |
Flexion at 180°/sec | 624 ± 306 | 510 ± 130 | 521 ± 279 | 493 ± 171 | +79.8% | 0.02 |
Ankle Concentric Strength | ||||||
Extension at 30°/sec | 72.5 ± 22·8 | 80.4 ± 16.5 | 52.9 ± 23.7 | 59 ± 16 | +1.5% | 0.32 |
Flexion at 30°/sec | 22.1 ± 8·8 | 24.0 ± 6.6 | 20.5 ± 8.3 | 21.8 ± 6.5 | −26.6% | 0.28 |
Ankle Eccentric Strength | ||||||
Extension at 30°/sec | 108 ± 28.0 | 121 ± 29.5 | 74.8 ± 34.1 | 83.2 ± 25.3 | −1.6% | 0.39 |
Flexion at 30°/sec | 36 ± 12.4 | 38.9 ± 10.2 | 30.1 ± 13.3 | 34.9 ± 8.8 | +37.3% | 0.07 |
Back Concentric Strength | ||||||
Extension at 60°/sec | 249 ± 97 | 222 ± 72 | 218 ± 96 | 202 ± 72 | +27.6% | 0.44 |
Flexion at 60°/sec | 132 ± 23 | 133 ± 46 | 119 ± 31 | 127 ± 44 | +54.2% | 0.10 |
P-values represent the significance of the effects of LMMS vs. controls.