Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 8.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Aging. 2010 Dec;25(4):949–962. doi: 10.1037/a0020000

Table 3. Age Group Differences on Baseline and Dual Task Measures of Tracking Performance, Fluency, Grammatical Complexity, and Linguistic Content.

Young Adults Older Adults

Baseline Dual Task Conditions
Baseline Dual Task Conditions
Moderate Demanding Moderate Demanding

Mean SE Mean SE Mean SE Mean SE Mean SE Mean SE
Performance
Time On
Task
79.39a 0.04 68.10 1.12 25.78 1.08 78.76a 1.02 70.69 0.49 24.33 0.72
Error 3.72a 0.02 4.17 0.06 8.34 0.07 3.66a 0.05 3.82 0.02 7.94 0.03
Fluency
Speech rate 121.39 2.77 100.28 2.39 68.70 2.20 97.48 2.97 84.26 2.91 60.93 2.30
% with Fillers 55.68 3.21 24.51 1.34 21.19 1.24 5.59a 0.61 5.40a 0.39 5.48a 0.49
% Grammatical 51.70a 0.01 43.35 0.01 39.43 0.01 49.77a,b 0.01 45.75b 0.01 39.58 0.01
Mean Length
Utterance
10.83 0.15 9.26 0.13 7.14 0.16 9.04a 0.25 9.03a 0.27 7.67 0.25
Complexity
Developmental
Level
3.91 0.07 3.25 0.09 1.45 0.10 3.50a 0.10 3.29a 0.10 1.33 0.10
Grammatical
Index
4.05 0.06 2.86 0.03 2. 12 0.04 3.99a 0.06 3.55a 0.04 3.11 0.04
Content
Propositional
Density
51.57a 0.03 61.57 0.04 35.91 0.06 53.82a,b 0.03 53.61b 0.03 38.68 0.03
Coherence
Index
5.25a 0.11 4.92 0.14 2.29 0.16 3.59a,b 0.14 3.51b 0.16 1.37 0.13
Type Token
Ratio
0.35a .01 .60 .01 .51 .07 .64 a,b .01 .66 b .01 .65b .01

NOTE: Within age group, entries sharing the same superscript do not differ at p < .05; between age groups, baselines sharing the same superscripts do not differ at p < .05.