Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Ther. 2010 Sep 16;42(1):22–29. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2010.01.004

Table 3a.

Correlations between Positive Staff Engagement and Resident Engagement, Affect, and Activities – Participants from Control Facilities. (P values derived from random effects regression models are given in parentheses.)

Subject (# of Observations) Resident Interest Resident Pleasure Organized Activity Participation Informal Group Activity Participation Activities of Daily Living (including Dining) Resident Walking/Wheeling in Hallway
C1 (69) .25 (.037) .22 (.069) .88 (< .001) -.12 (.320) -.04 (.734) -.14 (.249)
C2 (86) .51 (< .001) .15 (.191) N/A .01 (.966) .34 (.002) .25 (.024)
C3 (73) .25 (.026) .06 (.615) .50 (< .001) .11 (.318) .14 (.204) .23 (.042)
C4 (86) .36 (< .001) .17 (.108) .88 (< .001) -.10 (.341) -.07 (.507) .30 (.004)
C5 (65) .25 (.042) .60 (< .001) .89 (< .001) -.10 (.402) -.14 (.252) .07 (.582)
C6 (68) .39 (< .001) .48 (< .001) .13 (.287) .03 (.836) N/A .43 (<.001)
All Controls .33 (< .001) .39 (.046) .74 (.001) -.03 (.548) <.01 (.885) .18 (.096)

Note: N/A means code did not occur for that resident so no correlation could be computed.