Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 15.
Published in final edited form as: Biochemistry. 2011 Feb 14;50(10):1755–1762. doi: 10.1021/bi101662j

Table 3.

Most relevant structural and chemical properties featured by each RPAR analog interacting with NRP-1 averaged over 5 ns of MD simulation. Averaged values for wild type RPAR (system I) were obtained using the last 5 ns of the 40 ns simulation.

RPAR Analog Average RMSD (Å) % Preserved interactionsa Total interaction energy (kcal·mol−1)b
(D)RPAR 1.25±0.9 97% −125.3±3.4
R(D)PAR 2.01±1.0 85% −94.0±7.7
RP(D)AR 2.21±1.1 79% −88.4±5.6
RPA(D)R 1.31±0.5 96% −129.9±3.2
I 1.24±0.2c 99%d −133.6±2.5e
II cis 1.44±0.7 78% −98.5±3.3
trans 1.29±0.6 98% −129.3±3.9
III cis 1.85±0.4 96% −111.1±5.1
trans 1.92±0.5 93% −109.4±4.7
IV cis 1.99±0.6 91% −101.0±2.3
trans 1.34±0.3 97% −122.6±3.5
V 1.81±0.91 72% −77.2±5.7
VI 2.18 ±0.94 73% −89.2±6.1
VII 1.25±0.3 99% −131.3±2.9
a

Computed as the percentage of preserved specific interactions analyzed in Table 2 over 5 ns of simulation.

b

The total interaction energy was determined by summing the individual interaction energies, which were obtained for each specific interaction as was indicated in Table 2.

c

Values extracted for those residues that constitute the receptor model.

d

Values extracted combining information from Figures 1c and 1d.

e

The values of the individual interactions energies were extracted from Table 2