Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep 1;24(5):409–420. doi: 10.1007/s10557-010-6263-7

Table 3.

Post hoc analyis- nonsuperiority of combination versus monotherapy over time

Parameter EPO±GCSF (n = 8) EPO (n = 8) GCSF (n = 8) ANOVA F test
LVEF (%)
 Baseline 56.8 (1.3) 57.7 (0.8) 56.6 (0.6) NS
 1 Week post MIa 41.1 (1.6)* 43.8 (0.7)* 42.8 (1.5)* NS
 6 Weeks post MIa 41 (1.2)* 39.3 (2.5)*, *** 38.4 (2.1)*, *** NS
 Repeated measures ANOVA (main effect) p < 0.01 p < 0.01 p < 0.01
LVEDV (mL)
 Baseline 53.2 (0.9) 53.2 (2) 49.6 (1.2) NS
 1 Week post MIa 62.5 (1.5)* 63.5 (2.5)* 60.7 (2.1)* NS
 6 Weeks post MIa 67.9 (2)*, ** 70.8 (2.1)*, *** 70.5 (1.7)*, *** NS
 Repeated measures ANOVA (main effect) p < 0.01 p < 0.01 p < 0.01
LVESV (mL)
 Baseline 22.9 (0.9) 22.6 (0.9) 21.3 (0.4) NS
 1 Week post MIa 36.8 (1.2)* 35.6 (1.6)* 34.4 (1)* NS
 6 Weeks post MIa 40.7 (1.5)* 43.1 (3.2)*, *** 44 (2.3)*, *** NS
 Repeated measures ANOVA (main effect) p < 0.01 p < 0.01 p < 0.01

The values are expressed as the mean± by standard error (in parentheses)

LVEF left ventricle ejection fraction, LVEDV LV end-diastolic volume, LVESV LV end-systolic volume

NS Non significant

aChange from baseline value; significance of post-hoc test in repeated measures ANOVA design

*p < 0.01 vs. baseline, **p < 0.05 vs. 1 week, ***p < 0.01 vs. 1 week