Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar;162(5):1202–1212. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01133.x

Table 3.

Comparison of affinity of MEN16132 and a series of derivatives substituted in the place of the tetrahydropyranyl group (X) at the wild type and W86A mutant human B2 receptorInline graphic

Compound i.d. compound1 X Ki wild type (nM) Ki W86A mutant (nM) Fmut
MEN16132 72 Inline graphic 0.4 (0.3–0.6) 713 (340–1500) 1782
MEN15880 63 Inline graphic 1 (0.7–1.3) 650 (330–1320) 650
MEN16318 70 Inline graphic 12 (8–20) 2860 (750–5000) 238
MEN16298 68 Inline graphic 3.4 (1.8–6.3) 808 (330–1975) 237
MEN16303 69 Inline graphic 13 (11–16) 525 (200–2400) 40

Fmut index was calculated as Ki (mutant receptor)/Ki (wild type receptor), and corresponds to fold decrease in affinity.

1

Compound i.d. from Fattori et al. (2007).