Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Neurol. 2011 Feb;69(2):328–340. doi: 10.1002/ana.22238

Table 3.

Comparison of selected clinical characteristics in the Chloride and Sodium Channel Myotonias

Chloride channel myotonia
(n=18)
Sodium Channel myotonia
(n=11)
Eye closure myotonia
Present
(% of whole group)
56 91
Warm-up phenomenon
(% of those with EC myotonia)
80 60*
Paradoxical myotonia
(% of those with EC myotonia)
20 70*
Clinically symptomatic **
(% of whole group)
17 82
Falls***
Present (%) 78 27
Mild (%) 33 18
Moderate (%) 22 0
Severe (%) 22 1

EC = eye closure

*

Some sodium channel myotonia patients had a combination of paradoxical eye closure myotonia and warm-up

**

The patient considers the eye closure myotonia uncomfortable or interfering with daily activities e.g. driving, walking in the cold.

***

Mild: Infrequent falls with minor or no injuries; Moderate: fairly frequent falls, occasional injuries; Severe: ‘locking’ with trauma to head or face