Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 22;11:127. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-127

Table 3.

Clinical actions: use of appropriate investigations (%)

Hospital A (n = 56) Hospital B (n = 26) Hospital C (n = 20) Hospital D (n = 13)
NA No exam Omitted Done NA No exam Omitted Done NA No exam Omitted Done NA No exam Omitted Done
Chest radiograph 0 - 38 63 0 - 35 65 0 - 35 65 0 - 0 100
Sputum Smear 0 - 52 48 4 - 42 54 10 - 85 5 15 - 0 85
Sputum Culture 0 - 75 25 4 - 54 42 10 - 90 0 15 - 0 85
LN aspiration 11 80 9 0 23 77 0 0 45 35 15 5 69 8 15 8
Pleural tap 66 21 2 11 0 96 0 4 10 70 0 20 69 8 8 15
Lumbar puncture 54 25 2 20 19 62 0 19 30 40 5 25 46 15 0 39
Other 25 - 68 7 8 - 89 4 10 - 45 45 54 - 0 46

The TB-PBPR tool was used to assess whether appropriate investigations were performed. We recorded 'NA' where the investigation was not applicable (for example, where 'Sputum Smear' had identified acid fast bacilli), we recorded 'no exam' where the relevant clinical examination was not documented, we recorded 'omitted' where an investigation was applicable but not performed, and we recorded 'done' where the investigation was performed. For example, in hospital C, lymph node (LN) aspiration was not applicable in 45% of patients and was not documented in 35% of patients. LN aspiration was omitted in 15% and done in 5% of the patients.