Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb;6(2):311–318. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00330110

Table 2.

Conventional PD versus CFPD per patient

Patient Used % of Glucose Solution UF (ml/1.73 m2 per minute) Clearance Urea (ml/1.73 m2 per minute) Clearance Creatinine (ml/1.73 m2 per minute) MTAC Urea (ml/1.73 m2 per minute) MTAC Creatinine (ml/1.73 m2 per minute)
Conventional
    patient 1 (conventional before CFPD) 1.5% −0.41 2.1 3.5 2.4 4.9
    patient 2 (conventional after CFPD) 1.5% 0.77 6.1 5.4 18.4 11.2
    patient 3 (mean before and after) 1.5% 0.17 5.6 3.8 10.2 5.1
    patient 4 (mean before and after) 2.5/4.25% 1.4 4.6 4.1 4.5 5.6
    patient 5 (mean before and after) 2.5% −1.1 4.0 21.5 9.4 9.9
    patient 6 (mean before and after) 4.25% 0.37 7.5 7.5 20.2 35.5
CFPD
    patient 1 1.5% 1.28 12.3 18.0 8.8 14.2
    patient 2 1.5% 1.47 14.4 14.7 10.9 11.1
    patient 3 1.5% 2.07 13.1 15.7 8.5 10.8
    patient 4 2.5/4.25% 4.3 18.2 43.1 11.2 43.7
    patient 5 2.5% 0.6 15.4 39.2 11.7 42.1
    patient 6 4.25% 1.3 16.9 41.9 12.6 45.7
Mean results
Mean conventional PD 0.20 5.0 7.6 10.9 12.0
Mean CFPD 1.8 15.0 28.8 10.6 27.9
Proportional difference with CFPD +344% +498% +157% +323%

UF, ultrafiltration; MTAC, mass transfer area coefficient; CFPD, continuous flow peritoneal dialysis; PD, peritoneal dialysis.