Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb;6(2):334–343. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06240710

Table 2.

Physician attitudes regarding the collaborative care of a hypothetical patient with CKD

Characteristica/Physician Attitudes All (n = 244) PCPs (n = 124) Nephrologists (n = 120) P
Perceived ancillary support <0.001
    lacking 102 (42) 68 (55) 34 (28)
    sufficient 139 (57) 55 (44) 84 (70)
Medical care I provide slows diseaseb <0.001
    no 34 (14) 28 (23) 6 (5)
    yes 207 (85) 94 (76) 113 (94)
Insurance plays role in referralc 0.014
    never/rarely 205 (84) 112 (90) 93 (78)
    often/always 33 (14) 9 (7) 24 (20)
Difficulty referring to nephrologyd NA
    never/rarely 106 (85)
    often/always 17 (14)
Patients referred too latee NA
    disagree 55 (46)
    agree 63 (53)
Inappropriate medicationsf NA
    disagree 82 (68)
    agree 35 (29)
Practice too full to accommodateg NA
    disagree 105 (88)
    agree 11 (9)

Values expressed as number (percent). Percentages may not equal 100% because of missing values.

a

Of 244 physicians recommending nephrology referral and answering question regarding collaborative care.

b

Physicians were asked if they believed the medical care they implemented for patients such as in the hypothetical scenario helps to slow progression of kidney disease and improve outcomes.

c

PCPs were asked how often insurance plays a role in their decision to refer to nephrology. Nephrologists were asked if they felt health insurance restricts PCPs' abilities to refer early.

d

PCPs were asked how often they had difficulty referring to nephrology.

e

Nephrologists were asked if they felt patients were referred to nephrology late in their care, without time to potentially slow progression of their CKD.

f

Nephrologists were asked if they felt patients referred to them have been prescribed inappropriate medication regimens.

g

Nephrologists were asked if they felt they had little capacity to accommodate early CKD patients.