Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 9;6(3):e16804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016804

Table 2. Comparison of ‘new’ and ‘current’ biomarkers by logistic regression.

Statistic New Biomarkers (n) Current biomarker (n) New + Current
T-Tf (WB) (99) Tf-1 (87) Tf-β2 (87) T-Tf ELISA (99) T-tau (95) T-Tf (WB)+T-tau
Area under ROC (95%CI) 0.90 (0.85–0.94) 0.86 (0.80–0.92) 0.82 (0.76–0.89) 0.80 (0.73–0.88) 0.78 (0.71–0.85) 0.93 (0.89–0.97)
Sensitivity (95%CI) 85.9 (77.1–91.8) 85.1 (75.4–91.5) 85.1 (75.4–91.5) 85.9 (77.1–91.8) 85.3 (76.2–91.4) 85.3 (76.2–91.4)
Specificity (95%CI) 71.6 (59.1–81.7) 65.7 (53.0–76.6) 64.2 (51.5–75.3) 64.1 (51.0–75.4) 48.4 (35.9–61.2) 87.5 (76.3–94.1)
Positive LR (95%CI) 3.0 (2.1–4.5) 2.5 (1.8–3.5) 2.4 (1.7–3.3) 2.4 (1.7–3.3) 1.7 (1.3–2.1) 6.8 (3.5–13.1)
Negative LR (95%CI) 0.2 (0.1–0.3) 0.2 (0.1–0.4) 0.2 (0.1–0.4) 0.2 (0.1–0.4) 0.3 (0.2–0.5) 0.2 (0.1–0.3)
PPV (%) (95%CI) 81.7 (72.7–88.4) 76.3 (66.4–84.1) 75.5 (65.6–83.4) 78.7 (69.6–85.8) 71.1 (61.7–79.0) 91.0 (82.6–95.8)
NPV (%) (95%CI) 77.4 (64.7–86.7) 77.2 (63.8–86.8) 76.8 (63.3–86.6) 74.5 (60.7–84.9) 68.9 (53.2–81.4) 80.0 (68.4–88.3)
AIC 0.81 0.96 1.03 1.06 1.23 0.70
Accuracy 80.1 76.6 76 77.3 70.4 86.2

Note: Accuracy was defined as true positives + true negatives/total number tested.

Cut-off was chosen to achieve a sensitivity of ∼85% [38], [39].

Positive/negative LR results are robust to variations in prevalence rates between the study and overall population, and are provided in addition to PPV/NPV that are highly dependent on the population tested.