Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2010 Nov 30;65(2):471–479. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22556

Table 3.

Comparison of determined OEF with existing literature values for normal subjects.

Modality Reference Measurement location OEF: mean±std (range, n) Measurement time (minutes)
Catheterisation Chieregato et al., 2003 (35) Jugular bulb 0.42 (0.29~0.54, n=12)
PET Leender et al., 1990 (36) Gray Matter 0.42 (0.27~0.50, n=34)
PET Raichle et al., 2001 (37) Gray/White Matter 0.40±0.09 (n=19)
PET Fox et al., 1988 (38) Visual Cortex 0.361
MRI 1.5T T2 Oja et al., 1999 (15) draining veins near Visual Cortex 0.45 (0.37~0.54, n=7)2 11.0
MRI 1.5T T2 Golay et al., 2001 (16) draining veins near Visual Cortex 0.38±0.04 (0.30~0.46, n=8) 6.0
MRI 3.0T T2 Lu et al., 2007 (19) Sagittal Sinus 0.34±0.06 (n=24) 4.3
MRI 3.0T T2 Chen et al., 2010 (42) IJV 0.40±0.083 (n=10) 4.5
MRI 1.5T T2 An et al., 2000 (39) Gray/White Matter 0.40±0.02 (0.37~0.44, n=8) 8.5
MRI 3.0T T2 He et al., 2007 (40) Gray/White Matter 0.38±0.05 (0.33~0.48, n=9) 8.5
MRI 3.0T susceptibility Fernandez-Seara et al., 2006 (41) IJV 0.33±0.08 (n=5) 4.3
MRI 3.0T T2 this study IJV 0.37±0.04 (0.32~0.42, n=20) 0.8
1

Calculated using CMRO2 = 1.5 μmol/g/min, Hct = 0.41, and CBF = 0.5 ml/g/min.

2

Recalculated from Oja’s T2v values using the newly determined calibration constants by Golay et al. at 1.5T (16).

3

Calculated using Yv = 0.58 and Ya = 0.98 (42).