Table 3.
MD objects to one or more contraceptive methods |
MD would not offer one or more contraceptive methods |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
% | N | P* | OR(95%CI) † | % | N | P* | OR† | |
Gender | ||||||||
Female | 2 | 12 | .001 | 1.0 referent | 5 | 28 | .05 | 1.0 referent |
Male | 7 | 42 | 2.0(1.0–4.0) | 8 | 51 | 1.4(.8–2.5) | ||
Region | ||||||||
South | 6 | 23 | .1 | 1.0 referent | 9 | 36 | .06 | 1.0 referent |
Midwest | 5 | 12 | .9(.4–2.1) | 6 | 17 | .6(.3–1.3) | ||
Northeast | 2 | 8 | .4(.1–1.1) | 5 | 15 | .6(.3–1.2) | ||
West | 5 | 9 | 1.0(.4–2.2) | 4 | 9 | .4(.2–.9) | ||
Religious affiliation | ||||||||
Non-evangelical Protestant | 5 | 15 | .005 | 1.0 referent | 6 | 19 | .4 | 1.0 referent |
Evangelical Protestant | 10 | 9 | 1.6(.7–4.0) | 11 | 10 | 1.5(.7–3.5) | ||
Catholic | 7 | 20 | 1.3(.6–2.8) | 8 | 23 | 1.2(.6–2.4) | ||
Muslim | 2 | 1 | .4(.05–3.4) | 2 | 1 | .2(.03–2.0) | ||
Jewish | 1 | 4 | .2(.07–.7) | 4 | 8 | .6(.2–1.5) | ||
Hindu | 2 | 2 | .6(.08–4.8) | 5 | 6 | .9(.2–3.4) | ||
Other religion | 4 | 2 | .9(.1–5.4) | 10 | 5 | 2.2(.7–7.1) | ||
No religion | 1 | 1 | .2(.02–1.5) | 5 | 5 | .8(.3–2.2) | ||
Importance of religion | ||||||||
Not/fairly important | 2 | 9 | <.001 | 1.0 referent | 5 | 34 | .1 | 1.0 referent |
Very/most important | 9 | 45 | 6.0(2.5–14) | 8 | 44 | 1.4(.8–2.5) | ||
Attendance at services | ||||||||
2 per year or less | 1 | 5 | <.001 | 1.0 referent | 5 | 19 | .06 | 1.0 referent |
3x per year to monthly | 2 | 6 | 1.5(.4–6.0) | 6 | 17 | 1.1(.5–2.6) | ||
Twice a month or more | 9 | 43 | 7.4(2.5–22) | 9 | 42 | 1.9(1.0–3.7) |
Percentages reflect survey-design adjusted estimates of all US Ob-Gyn physicians.
P values reflect the bivariate associations between background characteristics and objections/unwillingness to offer specific contraceptives.
Multivariable odds ratios include gender, race, age, and region. For gender and region the analysis also includes religious affiliation, importance of religion, and attendance at services.