Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Nov 11;204(2):124.e1–124.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.051

Table 3.

Ob/Gyn physicians’ objections and unwillingness to offer a contraceptive, by gender, region, and religious characteristics

MD objects to one or more
contraceptive methods
MD would not offer one or more
contraceptive methods
% N P* OR(95%CI) % N P* OR
Gender
Female 2 12 .001 1.0 referent 5 28 .05 1.0 referent
Male 7 42 2.0(1.0–4.0) 8 51 1.4(.8–2.5)
Region
South 6 23 .1 1.0 referent 9 36 .06 1.0 referent
Midwest 5 12 .9(.4–2.1) 6 17 .6(.3–1.3)
Northeast 2 8 .4(.1–1.1) 5 15 .6(.3–1.2)
West 5 9 1.0(.4–2.2) 4 9 .4(.2–.9)
Religious affiliation
Non-evangelical Protestant 5 15 .005 1.0 referent 6 19 .4 1.0 referent
Evangelical Protestant 10 9 1.6(.7–4.0) 11 10 1.5(.7–3.5)
Catholic 7 20 1.3(.6–2.8) 8 23 1.2(.6–2.4)
Muslim 2 1 .4(.05–3.4) 2 1 .2(.03–2.0)
Jewish 1 4 .2(.07–.7) 4 8 .6(.2–1.5)
Hindu 2 2 .6(.08–4.8) 5 6 .9(.2–3.4)
Other religion 4 2 .9(.1–5.4) 10 5 2.2(.7–7.1)
No religion 1 1 .2(.02–1.5) 5 5 .8(.3–2.2)
Importance of religion
Not/fairly important 2 9 <.001 1.0 referent 5 34 .1 1.0 referent
Very/most important 9 45 6.0(2.5–14) 8 44 1.4(.8–2.5)
Attendance at services
2 per year or less 1 5 <.001 1.0 referent 5 19 .06 1.0 referent
3x per year to monthly 2 6 1.5(.4–6.0) 6 17 1.1(.5–2.6)
Twice a month or more 9 43 7.4(2.5–22) 9 42 1.9(1.0–3.7)

Percentages reflect survey-design adjusted estimates of all US Ob-Gyn physicians.

*

P values reflect the bivariate associations between background characteristics and objections/unwillingness to offer specific contraceptives.

Multivariable odds ratios include gender, race, age, and region. For gender and region the analysis also includes religious affiliation, importance of religion, and attendance at services.