Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Rehabil Nurs. 2011 Jan–Feb;36(1):32–42. doi: 10.1002/j.2048-7940.2011.tb00063.x

Table 1.

Changes in Physical Activity, Physical Function, and Exercise Self-Efficacy Over Time

Measure Baseline M (SD) End of 6-Month Intervention Period M (SD) End of 6-Month Follow-Up M (SD)
Performance of LE Exercise16 (volume LE exercise per week by diary)
 Intervention 0 (0) 289.8 (318.8) 341.7 (390.8)
 Control 51.7 (72.5) 21.2 (63.7) 84.3 (137.4)
Participation in Fitness Walking6 (minutes walked per week by diary)
 Intervention 75.2 (84.2) 95.5 (125.2) 141.3 (131.4)
 Control 76.1 (96.8) 99.9 (229.2) 96.4 (152.0)
6-Minute Walk13 (yards)
 Intervention 442.4 (87.2) 466.1 (101.3) 480.0 (94.9)
 Control 512.8 (105.4) 504.4 (106.6) 502.3 (104.3)
SPPB2,46
 Intervention 10.8 (1.9) 11.6 (1.9) 11.6 (1.4)
 Control 11.3 (1.7) 11.4 (1.9) 11.5 (2.2)
WOMAC Physical Function
 Intervention 22.5 (11.6) 17.3 (13.1) 18.9 (13.2)
 Control 23.6 (11.6) 22.9 (14.9) 21.6 (10.3)
Exercise Self-Efficacy
 Intervention 57.8 (22.2) 63.9 (22.1) 71.5 (21.2)
 Control 60.3 (32.7) 55.8 (31.1) 43.6 (34.1)

Note: LE = lower extremity; SPPB = short physical performance battery; WOMAC = Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index;

1

p < .05 for group by time interaction effect;

2

p < .05 for interaction effect improvement from baseline to end of 6-month intervention period;

3

p < .05 for interaction effect improvement from baseline to end of 6-month follow-up;

4

p < .05 for time effect;

5

p < .05 for time effect improvement from baseline to end of 6-month intervention period;

6

p < .05 for time effect improvement from baseline to end of 6-month follow-up.