Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 10.
Published in final edited form as: Epidemics. 2009 Nov 12;1(4):230–239. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2009.10.003

Figure 1. Definitions and examples of simulated trees.

Figure 1

(A) An example of a randomly generated true tree, with perfect “clocklike” edges. H is the total tree height, and Δd is the true (expected) distance between sample 1 and 2 OTUs. This tree is at Δd/H=0.2 and 20 OTUs in each sample. Thus, this tree shows the definitions of Δd and H, and is the true tree on which the trees in panels B and C were simulated, allowing for comparison between estimated rate and expected rate (Δ/Δd). (B) The same tree topology with Poisson distributed edges, and scaled so that Δd = 0.1 substitutions/site. 1 is the average distance from the root to sample 1 OTUs, 2 is the average distance from the root to sample 2 OTUs, and Δ is the estimated rate between the samples. (C) The same tree topology with Poisson distributed edges, and scaled so that Δd = 0.001 substitutions/site. Note that many expected short edges become zero at this low rate, and samples 1 and 2 are not well separated. Open squares are sample 1 OTUs and filled squares sample 2 OTUs. Trees in B and C are examples of trees used in evaluating our method, scaled to the shown scale bars. The tree in A is of arbitrary length.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure