Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Radiol. 2011 Feb;18(2):129–142. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.09.007

Table 9.

Simulation results: power estimates for 10 readers, 200 cases, and effect size (AUC difference) = .066. Notes: the “Actual power” estimate 0.781 is from the last line of Table 8; the “Reliable estimates” column contains power estimates based on the mean parameter estimates from Table 8; the “Sample estimates” column contains the mean of the sample power estimates across the 4000 simulated samples; P25 and P75 are the 25th and 75th percentiles of the sample power estimates; r =number of readers; c =number of cases.

Power estimated from
r c Actual power Reliable estimates Sample estimates P25 P75 P75−P25
3 50 0.781 0.729 0.773 0.639 0.955 .316
3 100 0.781 0.742 0.776 0.658 0.935 .277
3 200 0.781 0.745 0.772 0.653 0.918 .265
5 50 0.781 0.742 0.768 0.635 0.930 .295
5 100 0.781 0.744 0.766 0.655 0.906 .251
5 200 0.781 0.751 0.767 0.666 0.892 .226
10 50 0.781 0.749 0.765 0.649 0.903 .254
10 100 0.781 0.747 0.760 0.662 0.868 .206
10 200 0.781 0.749 0.760 0.675 0.856 .181

mean: 0.744 0.767 .252